Fox
News viewers have discovered a disturbing clip that might have foretold
the demise of President Donald Trump, amid growing concerns about his
wellbeing.
Back in January 2024, Fox host Jesse
Watters brought UK fortune teller Paula Roberts onto his live broadcast
to conduct a tarot card reading about the future of the
commander-in-chief. Setting up the segment, Watters informed his
audience, "Paula Roberts is the English psychic who is on set to give us
a reading right now. I would like, Paula, for you to give me a reading
on President Trump."
After explaining she would draw
just one card from her deck, Paula paused momentarily before declaring,
"One card. Let's do just one card, we like that one... Uh-oh." The card
she revealed was Death, causing Watters to inquire, "What is that?"
With
a nervous chuckle, Paula responded, "I mean I do recognize that I'm at
Fox TV, um. No, no, let me move on. It's a sense of loss. It's as if he
may be thinking more about what he's lost and not still taking full
advantage of what he still has."
Watters
chuckled in response, "That's a great interpretation, Paula," while the
psychic emphasized, "It's true, I don't make it up." Recently, Trump,
79, has appeared weakened after disappearing from public view, reports
the Express.
On
Tuesday, US President Donald Trump made a first public official
appearance in the Oval Office after a short disappearance this weekend,
with many remarking on his 'rough' look.
About
45 minutes late for his own 2 p.m. Oval Office press conference to
announce that U.S. Space Command will be located in Alabama, reversing a
Biden-era decision to keep it at its temporary headquarters in
Colorado, he kept his speech unusually short. While Trump is often very
late for his scheduled events, this one comes after 'death' rumors
swirled over the weekend, with many questioning the President's health.
One
liberal political commentator pointed out, "He looks rough and more
orange than normal. Wonder if the press will ask the important question
of why he was absent for a week." It comes after a Trump body double conspiracy theory emerged.
[. . .]
More
users began to point out Trump's look as he made the announcement. "His
eyes are still funky. Somethings wrong," one person said. Another
added, "Looks like it took an extra 50 minutes to make him look alert
and camera ready."
Another person pointed out
that Trump's hands has more makeup than usual, as he has been warned
lately about the bruises on his hands being a warning sign of something
worse. "He looks rough. Extra hand makeup applied," they wrote.
Donald Trump sparked more concerns over his health during a Tuesday, September 2, interview with Scott Jennings.
“I’m
always disappointed in him,” a very stuffy Trump said when discussing
Russian President Vladimir Putin. “He and I always had a great
relationship. Very disappointed. Thousands of people are dying.”
[. . .]
X
users were quick to pipe in, with one saying it “backs the stroke
hypothesis” as “stroke patients can sound ‘nasally’ due to dysarthria
and muscle weakness impacting the soft palate.”
“They
sound ‘strained,’ ‘hoarse’ and ‘nasal or hyponasal,’” they continued.
“So his voice actually continues to support the mild stroke position.”
“He’s
struggling to breathe,” another person said. “Respiratory issues are
indicative of a stroke. This along with his edema (swelling of the
ankles) and cardiac problems are signs that the end is imminent.”
Another person surmised Trump has COVID, which would he explain why “he sounds congested."
Let's
talk about Jane Fonda. In the 80s, as she built her Workout franchise
-- and made a lot of money for the CED and, later, Campaign for
California, certain Republicans got a British rag to run a lie (the
publication knew it was a lie) that she'd had a heart attack. The day
after that lie hit the press, Jane showed up at one of her studios and
invited the press as she led a Workout class to show that, no, she had
not had a heart attack.
So
where was Chump's workout? No where to be found. If he had a stroke
-- and he may have -- or if he didn't, nothing he did in public on
Tuesday dispels those rumors.
Jane
grasped that certain right-wingers in this country feared her
popularity and the money she was raising for solid causes. So she put
an end to the lie immediately by providing proof that she was healthy
and photos ran in papers around the world while videos of that morning's
workout made all the news programs like GOOD MORNING AMERICA.
That's how she ended a lie.
Somehow,
Chump either didn't care that much about what people were saying about
him (which is a first for him) or he's unable to prove he didn't have a
stroke.
I have no idea. I've never been one of his groupies so I have no reason to lie for him.
I did miss that one, yes. Thank you to C.I. for catching it and for noting me in the snapshot. Cheyenne Ubiera (Irish Star) notes something interesting about Chump:
Speculation and rumors surrounding Donald Trump's health persist following the discovery of an unusual bulge beneath his suit.
The
president addressed reporters on Tuesday, rejecting allegations that he
had passed away after being largely absent from the White House during
much of the Labor Day weekend.
[. . .]
However,
Trump's remarks failed to prevent observers from detecting something
unusual about his appearance, including an odd crease in his suit
sleeve. One individual on X commented, "Strange. Fabric doesn't normally
fall like that across an arm."
The
message was accompanied by an image of Trump from his White House
meeting. The user highlighted a peculiar protrusion beneath his jacket.
Some
suggested the bump resulted from a padded suit; nevertheless, the
original poster provided examples of padded suits to demonstrate that
this might not explain the anomaly.
"People
are suggesting this is a result of padded or extended shoulders," he
wrote. "Neither of these things have to do with how a sleeve falls."
One
individual pondered: "Why does such a wealthy man not have
well-tailored suits?" Another speculated that the unusual bulge was due
to someone steadying the president just before the photograph was
snapped.
This conjecture arises as a health
expert suggests that the president's vascular condition could
potentially result in amputation. Trump has been diagnosed with chronic
venous insufficiency (CVI), and images of his swollen ankles and bruises
have made the rounds on the internet.
When
President Donald Trump stepped into the Oval Office on Tuesday
afternoon for a major defense announcement, viewers expected policy
updates and watched closely after weeks of health speculation.
But the moment quickly went left as social media zeroed in on something else entirely: the president’s thinning hair.
Trump addressed weekend health rumors on Sept. 2, saying he had remained active over Labor Day weekend.
Social media users were quick to share their observations.
“[What]
is up with Donald Trump’s hair?!?” one person asked on Threads, echoing
the sentiment of thousands of others who noticed the president’s
increasingly sparse locks.
And
of course, his desperate need to not show off his gray hair leads him
to making it blond and that just emphasizes the baldness all the more:
August
2025 proved particularly challenging when Trump signed a Purple Heart
Day proclamation, unable to distract from the visible pink skin along
his part and crown. The president’s frequent bleach treatments have only
made the thinning more apparent, with lighter sections highlighting
sparse areas while darker portions frame them.
Today, survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell spoke out. The world's a little better as a result. When brave voices tell the truth, it makes a difference.
Chump immediately attacked them and called them a "hoax." Doesn't matter. Many people heard them and some for the first time. This helped the nation. I applaud these survivors and want to see justice for them. Release the files. That's a demand we need to make to honor those who were betrayed by the justice system and the Alex Acostas.
Wednesday, September 3, 2025. Epstein survivors to hold press
conference this morning, Speaker of the Closet Mike Johnson thinks he
can trick people, Chump can't escape the Epstein topic anymore than he
can stop the decaying of his own flesh, and much more.
At
the end of the 80s, Donald Chump began his friendships with sex
traffickers and pedophiles Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. This friendship lasted until at least 2007.
Chump was very cozy with Epstein and having recently moved Ghislaine
Maxwell to Club Fed in Bryan, Texas, he clearly remains tight with
Maxwell.
If you don't get just how disgusting
the deal he made with Ghislaine was or just how Todd Blanche refused to
ask questions of Maxwell during their two days of 'interviews,' make a
point to stream the video below from THE LAST WORD WITH LAWRENCE
O'DONNELL.
We
should all be appalled at the way Todd Blanche kissed the ass of a
convicted felon serving a 20 year sentence for sex trafficking. A
convicted felon was allowed to lie repeatedly and was never once
challenged. But she was laughed with, Blanche laughed with her and made
her feel comfortable as she lied non-stop.
Last night, Ben did a very important report for MEIDASTOUCH NEWS.
The reason it feels like Congress doesn’t exist anymore is because it functionally doesn’t,
but also because this summer vacation was extended. House Republicans
tucked tail and left early after fearing the possibility of having to
vote for transparency about the biggest underage sex ring in U.S.
history, which gives you a good sense of where we are with that party
right now.
House Speaker Mike Johnson had six weeks to figure out how to manage
the intra-party rebellion over the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Republican
members were still getting an earful
at home, so ducking a vote wasn’t practical. But Johnson needed to
uphold his prime directive of acting as a human shield for the president
and keeping his name out of any revelations.
So after weeks of rumination, here’s what Johnson came up with: a resolution,
hastily added to the week’s floor voting schedule on Monday, that would
“direct” the House Oversight Committee to continue investigating the
federal cases against Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, which is already in
progress. In other words, Johnson would have the House vote to do
something it is effectively already doing.
The word you may be grasping for is “misdirection.”
This resolution is being floated for a vote to keep people away from a bipartisan bill
from Reps. Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Tom Massie (R-KY), which would directly
compel the relevant government agencies to release all relevant files.
Yesterday, Khanna and Massie launched the discharge petition process
for their bill. If it gets signatures from a majority of House members,
that bill will have to come to the floor, and the co-authors say they
already have that many in hand. They’re holding a press conference this morning with victims of Epstein’s sex ring.
Johnson’s gambit is to claim that he’s already giving supporters of
releasing the files a vote, so they shouldn’t have to sign onto the
discharge petition. That is the hard sell that both the House Republican
leadership and the White House, which is apparently whipping members to not sign onto the discharge petition, are making.
This is as much about Johnson controlling what gets on his House floor (which could trigger other bypass attempts, like on a congressional stock trading ban), but it’s based on a misimpression that the “attaboy Oversight Committee” resolution is the same as the Khanna-Massie bill.
Let's stop for a moment do deal with something of a housekeeping issue.
And
clicking on that takes you to the renamed reports "What’s in the batch
of Epstein files just released by a House committee" at THE NEWSHOUR.
Here's the transcript of the video they released and then a few hour
later killed.
Amna Nawaz:
Welcome to the "News Hour."
Congress is back in
Washington tonight, and the clock is already ticking. Lawmakers have
less than one month to avoid a government shutdown.
Geoff Bennett:
On the table, a fierce fight over billions in spending
cuts, some 30,000 pages worth of Jeffrey Epstein-related files that
Republicans just posted tonight online, and the Senate moving to
fast-track President Trump's nominees.
Our congressional correspondent, Lisa Desjardins, joins us now.
So, Lisa, it's always great to see you.
Let's start with the possible government shutdown at the end of the month. We are weeks away. How likely is it?
Lisa Desjardins:
It is possible.
Let's take people through exactly
how this is going to work, what we know. First of all, the deadline is
September 30 to fund most of government. Now, any deal needs 60 Senate
votes. So, of course, that means likely at least seven Democrats would
have to get on board.
Now, that's led to this situation where, of
course, Democrats know they have leverage here. They don't have leverage
in a lot of cases. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries today told
reporters, including myself, that he's looking for a bipartisan
solution. But what that really means is, he wants some concessions.
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY):
That spending bill has to be both bipartisan, a product
of negotiation, and it's got to serve the interests of the American
people in terms of their health, safety, national security, and economic
well-being.
Lisa Desjardins:
Health, safety, national security, economic, that covers everything. So, there's a lot on the table for him.
And
this is the man really to watch, Senate Democratic leader Chuck
Schumer. It's his vote that Republicans will need to get a funding bill
through, or it could be his decision to try to go all the way to a
government shutdown. It is very much on the table, a risky decision for
Democrats either way.
The pressure is on them to stand up to
President Trump, try and get some policy changes. But some Democrats say
a shutdown might benefit Trump.
Geoff Bennett:
And why are they feeling the pressure this week, Lisa?
Lisa Desjardins:
Right.
It seems like the 30th is a long way away.
It's not. One reason is because, in the middle of the month, there will
be a recess, a full week. So really it's just about two or three weeks
they have. And, remember, they're only in town three days a week mostly.
Geoff Bennett:
Let's talk about the other big news tonight.
The
House Oversight Committee released tens of thousands of pages of
documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. There had been
Republicans calling for more transparency, and this appears to be a step
in that direction?
Lisa Desjardins:
Right.
And a reminder, we're talking about Jeffrey
Epstein. He's the financier accused of sex crimes. His conspirator,
Ghislaine Maxwell, was sent to prison for those crimes. He also was
connected with many high-profile individuals, friends with Donald Trump,
though Trump has disavowed him since.
Here's what we got tonight,
documents like this, 33,000-plus pages of them. But I want to point
out, this document, our producer Matt Loffman quickly figured out, is
public. This is not something that is special to the Department of
Justice. This is something you could find on the Supreme Court's Web
site. This is Ghislaine Maxwell's — part of her appeal case.
So a
lot of this are legal documents. Going through them, we really don't
know how much of it is new. But I am told from House Oversight
Republicans that these are all the documents that DOJ has given them so
far.
Democrats have said, first of all, that these 34,000
documents is just 1 percent of the total. Now, Republicans are worried
about something else going on. That's a bipartisan effort by two — two
Republican — two members of Congress, Democratic Representative Ro
Khanna there on the right and then Thomas Massie of Kentucky. They are
trying to make an end run around House leadership to force release of
all documents, make them all public.
But the question is if the
votes are there. And, today, Speaker Johnson made it clear he doesn't
want that effort. And I think this release tonight is an attempt to try
and take votes away from that end run, so a lot in play. Do we know that
much more about Jeffrey Epstein tonight? Not yet. We will see.
Geoff Bennett:
Yes. Well, more to come on that front.
Again, I don't have time for people's bulls**t or their cowrdice.
I
counted fifty e-mails in the public account. I don't have time for
that, Martha and Shirley don't have time for that. If you make my life
harder, I don't give a damn about you.
I'll get
a call from at least two PBS friends when this goes up and I know
they'll have 101 excuses. But I don't give a damn. You've made my
morning harder and it's just not worth it to me to promote you or your
work if you're going to be a little coward and pull it. Related. It's
Wednesday. Will Ava and I do a piece at THIRD? Probably not. Everyone
else got Labor Day weekend off. But were supposed to now do -- on a
Wednesday -- a media piece? I've got enough on my plate. It's
Wednesday We'll do one this weekend but neither of us is in the mood to
spend three to four hours writing a piece today.
Republican
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) plans to take steps Tuesday to push for a
vote to release the Jeffrey Epstein files — and suggested a shadowy
billionaire in the famous "black book" is out to get him.
Lawmakers
are back from summer recess, and Massie and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) were
expected to file a discharge petition aimed at compelling the Department
of Justice to fully release all files related to the disgraced
financier's case. The bipartisan effort is underway from the House
Oversight Committee to uncover the files despite pushback from
Republican leaders.
"Jobs, the economy,
those are always the big issues, but you really can't solve any of that
if this place is corrupt," Massie told CNN.
CNN reporter Manu Raju asked, "What do you mean, if this place is corrupt?"
"Well,
I mean, if they're going to cover up for rich and powerful and
politically connected people, which is still what is happening right now
here," Massie said.
Massie, who has faced off
with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and the Trump administration over
calling for the release of the files, continues to face attacks.
"Look,
I got three billionaires right now running ads against me in Kentucky,
and one of them is in Epstein's black book. So I'm not worried about
it," Massie said. "I've already poked the hornet's nest here, and, you
know, once you're in for a penny, you're in for a pound. We're going to
get these files released."
First, Isn't
Alien Musk financing commercials against Massie, by the way. Musk had a
very tight relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Second, "we're going to get these files released"?
Not if Speaker of the Closet Mike Johnson has anything to say about it. Ailia Zehra noted Johnson does want a discharge effort to succeed:
House
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) pushed back Tuesday against the bipartisan
effort led by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) to
force release of the files related to convicted pedophile Jeffrey
Epstein, dismissing the effort as "meaningless."
“I
would describe virtually everything Thomas Massie says related to this
issue as meaningless. That’s my response," he told reporters on Capitol
Hill Tuesday.
House
GOP leaders on Tuesday morning added to this week’s House schedule a
vote on a resolution directing the House Oversight and Government Reform
Committee to continue its investigation into matters surrounding
convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The
addition comes as leaders contend with an alternative push to force a
vote on a bill that would direct the Trump administration to release
more Epstein material.
What's
going on? The discharge voice would demand all the paperwork. Speaker
of the Closet Johnson won't be able to run interference on behalf of
the White House if the discharge option is implemented. The only way he
can cover for Donald Chump is by ensuring that the House votes to
continue down the same road. That would be the wasted road that
resulted in the Dept of (Mis)Justice releasing to Congress last month . .
. papers already publicly available as the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee noted in a press release yesterday:
Washington, D.C. —
Rep. Robert Garcia, Ranking Member of the Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform, issued the following statement after Chairman James
Comer released to the public the partial batch of Epstein files from the
Department of Justice, consisting largely of already public
information. The original partial release failed to meet the
Department’s legal obligation to provide the full, unredacted documents
to the Committee while protecting victims and censoring child sexual
abuse materials.
“The 33,000 pages of
Epstein documents James Comer has decided to ‘release’ were already
mostly public information. To the American people – don’t let this fool
you.
After careful review, Oversight
Democrats have found that 97% of the documents received from the
Department of Justice were already public. There is no mention of any
client list or anything that improves transparency or justice for
victims.
House Republicans are trying
to make a spectacle of releasing already-public documents. Pam Bondi has
said the client list was on her desk. She could release it right now if
she wanted to.
While Comer tries to
give cover to Trump by re-releasing public documents, House Democrats
are fighting for real transparency. Pam Bondi must comply with our
subpoena immediately, and release all of the documents. The American
people demand it.”
Oversight Committee
Democrats’ initial review revealed that of the 33,295 pages of documents
released to the Committee, only three percent contained any new
information. The remaining 97% of pages included information previously
released by the Department of Justice, the Florida Department of Law
Enforcement or the Palm Beach County State Attorney’s office.
These include:
Video from the Metropolitan Correctional Center from the night of Epstein’s death
Supreme Court filings from Ghislaine Maxwell
Court filings from U.S. v. Maxwell
Court transcript from U.S. v. Maxwell
A Department of Justice Office of Inspector General Report on Epstein’s death
A memo from Attorney General Pamela Bondi to FBI Director Kash Patel on releasing the Epstein files
Communications between the Bureau of Prisons and the Department of Justice regarding the death of Epstein
Police reports and court filings from Epstein’s criminal case in Florida
The only new disclosure:
Less
than 1,000 pages from the Customs and Border Protection’s log of flight
locations of the Epstein plane from 2000-2014 and forms consistent with
reentry back to the U.S.
###
Johnson
thinks he can con people. I don't know about that.
This
morning MEIDASTOUCH NEWS already has a video up about the press
conference later this morning and Ben notes that MTN will be streaming
it live on YOUTUBE. The press conference is supposed to start around
10:30 this morning EST.
Yesterday, NBC NEWS spoke with some Epstein survivors.
On
Tuesday, US President Donald Trump made a first public official
appearance in the Oval Office after a short disappearance this weekend,
with many remarking on his 'rough' look.
About
45 minutes late for his own 2 p.m. Oval Office press conference to
announce that U.S. Space Command will be located in Alabama, reversing a
Biden-era decision to keep it at its temporary headquarters in
Colorado, he kept his speech unusually short. While Trump is often very
late for his scheduled events, this one comes after 'death' rumors
swirled over the weekend, with many questioning the President's health.
One
liberal political commentator pointed out, "He looks rough and more
orange than normal. Wonder if the press will ask the important question
of why he was absent for a week." It comes after a Trump body double conspiracy theory emerged.
[. . .]
More
users began to point out Trump's look as he made the announcement. "His
eyes are still funky. Somethings wrong," one person said. Another
added, "Looks like it took an extra 50 minutes to make him look alert
and camera ready."
Another person pointed out
that Trump's hands has more makeup than usual, as he has been warned
lately about the bruises on his hands being a warning sign of something
worse. "He looks rough. Extra hand makeup applied," they wrote.
Donald Trump sparked more concerns over his health during a Tuesday, September 2, interview with Scott Jennings.
“I’m
always disappointed in him,” a very stuffy Trump said when discussing
Russian President Vladimir Putin. “He and I always had a great
relationship. Very disappointed. Thousands of people are dying.”
[. . .]
X
users were quick to pipe in, with one saying it “backs the stroke
hypothesis” as “stroke patients can sound ‘nasally’ due to dysarthria
and muscle weakness impacting the soft palate.”
“They
sound ‘strained,’ ‘hoarse’ and ‘nasal or hyponasal,’” they continued.
“So his voice actually continues to support the mild stroke position.”
“He’s
struggling to breathe,” another person said. “Respiratory issues are
indicative of a stroke. This along with his edema (swelling of the
ankles) and cardiac problems are signs that the end is imminent.”
Another person surmised Trump has COVID, which would he explain why “he sounds congested."
Let's
talk about Jane Fonda. In the 80s, as she built her Workout franchise
-- and made a lot of money for the CED and, later, Campaign for
California, certain Republicans got a British rag to run a lie (the
publication knew it was a lie) that she'd had a heart attack. The day
after that lie hit the press, Jane showed up at one of her studios and
invited the press as she led a Workout class to show that, no, she had
not had a heart attack.
So
where was Chump's workout? No where to be found. If he had a stroke
-- and he may have -- or if he didn't, nothing he did in public on
Tuesday dispels those rumors.
Jane
grasped that certain right-wingers in this country feared her
popularity and the money she was raising for solid causes. So she put
an end to the lie immediately by providing proof that she was healthy
and photos ran in papers around the world while videos of that morning's
workout made all the news programs like GOOD MORNING AMERICA.
That's how she ended a lie.
Somehow,
Chump either didn't care that much about what people were saying about
him (which is a first for him) or he's unable to prove he didn't have a
stroke.
I have no idea. I've never been one of his groupies so I have no reason to lie for him.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:
Washington, D.C. — Following a new D.C. District Court ruling in the landmark antitrust case involving Google, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) released the following statement:
“The
court previously ruled that Google’s search business is an illegal
monopoly, but now the judge’s remedies fail to hold Google accountable
for breaking the law. Instead of restoring competition and ending
Google’s dominance, this ruling is a slap on the wrist for unlawful
behavior that warranted the breakup of this tech giant.
“Now it’s up to the Trump Justice Department and state attorneys
general to appeal or risk emboldening even more lawbreaking by Big Tech
monopolies.
“While the Trump Justice Department considers an appeal to break up
Google, YouTube and Google executives are negotiating with Trump’s
lawyers to settle a dubious case for potentially millions of dollars and
raising serious concerns of corruption in plain sight.”
No comments:
Post a Comment