I've weighed in on the topic of Joe Biden's Supreme Court nominee already in "Joe Biden, don't screw with me." But I wanted to return to it to note this from Jonathan Turley:
Biden has promised that he will not consider males or non-black candidates. Now, an ABC News/Ipsos poll shows that 76 percent of Americans reject such a threshold exclusionary rule based on race or gender.
During the primary, Biden wanted to garner support with black voters by saying that he would only consider black women for the next seat. He made the pledge after Rep. James Clyburn pushed him to do so during a break in the presidential debate. Biden turned around and made the commitment when the debate resumed according to a new book. Clyburn later gave Biden his critical endorsement that many (including Biden) attribute his victory to in the key South Carolina primary.
As discussed previously, commentators have insisted that Ronald Reagan, Donald Trump, and George H.W. Bush made the same pledge. That is also false. While seeking to appoint women and African Americans, none of the three excluded other races or genders from consideration and had diverse short lists. Yet, even if they did, the question remains: should admission to the Court be based on an exclusionary threshold qualification that the Court has rejected as unconstitutional or unlawful for schools and businesses.
Notably, even 54 percent of Democrats agreed that Biden should consider all potential candidates. “Just 23% want him to automatically follow through on his history-making commitment,” according to ABC News. Yet, Democratic senators have applauded Biden for his pledge.
My thoughts again? I don't need the nominee to be African-American or a woman. But if Joe's saying she's going to be Black, she better be Black -- not bi-racial or multi-racial. Black. That's what he's said. And I'm not talking about on the campaign trail. I'm talking about last week.
Now if he wants to go back on that -- on it being a Black woman -- he can. Just explain why -- that's not sarcasm. Just say, "I shouldn't have used those parameters." But if he's going to use them, the woman better be Black.
Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Monday, Janaury 31, 2022. The stalemate continues in Iraq as does the silence on NPR.
The stupidity never ends in the world of the press. Case in point, NPR's MORNING EDITION. They've found Iraq. They haven't. They speak to AP's Sarah El Deeb. Before they do, they want you to know that they're concerned about a "resurgence" of ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Resurgence? It never went away. We were addressing that on Friday, you may remember. This morning, ABNA reports, "A security source said two policemen were killed in the attack of the members of the ISIS terrorist group on the Iraqi province of Kirkuk on Sunday evening. The Iraqi security source told Shafaq News Agency that members of the ISIS terrorist group have attacked Kirkuk province on Sunday." NPR's ignoring that attack and they've ingored all the similar attacks. They add up and the death toll adds up. Is there a "resurgence" of ISIS in Iraq and Syria? Seems to me the only "resurgence" is in the US press bothering to note Iraq. And ten and fifteen can die a day in ISIS attacks and it doesn't matter. It only matters if the attack qualifies as "spectacular."
I'm appaled by the report for anothe reason. NPR wants you to know that, in Syria, the presion seige was carried out in part by holding children. No one takes a moment to decry children prisoners. No one takes a moment to call out children being in the same prison as adults. It's just move on and skirt every damn issue in the world but pretend that somehow, for a few seconds this week, you covered Iraq and Syria and did a segment that didn't find the hosts chuckling at the end. ("We haven't heard what happened to the children . . . We don't know how many died," Sarah declares. Alright then. Thanks for the information -- or whatever you want to call that.
What's further appalling is that the report is about Syria. The headline for the segment is "Attacks by the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq stoke concerns of a resurgence." Sarah El Deeb does not cover Iraq. She covers Syria. She can't speak to Iraq in any meaningful manner.
"We'll have to leave it there," Leila Fadel says cutting Sarah off during the too brief segment that never addresses Iraq. Not a good way to kick off your first day hosting MORNING EDITION. (Leila's hosted many NPR programs as a substitute before. She's now a regular host on MORNING EDITION.) It was also cute to watch them look back at Leila's work in the past. Egypt . . The US -- Fort Worth? (isn't that where her family lives) . . . Verything but Iraq. So 2005 through 2009 she covers Iraq but, hey, no need to offer that during the segment becuase NPR doesn't give two s**ts about Iraq. They make it clear every day in every way.
I have a feeling we're going to have to focus more on NPR in 2022 as it continues its progpaganda and ignores reality.
Three minutes on Syria -- supposedly Iraq and Syria -- and that's it. Over six minutes on an astronaut who may become something -- the first African-American woman to spend six months in space -- but thus far hasn't gong into space. Greg Myre delivers over four minutes of progaganda about how (he insists) Ukraine is trying to "break free from Moscow." Ukraine is split on what they want but, hey, if you're going to sell war, whore, baby, whore. Whore big or go home. And Greg Myre is one of the biggest whores that there has evern been. Got a sloppy floppy, Greg.
Has NPR filed a single report on the stalemate in Iraq? October 10th, elections were held. Still waiting on a government to be formed.
The Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) Vice-President Nechirvan Barzani
met with Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and parliamentary speaker
Mohammed al-Halbousi in Najaf on Monday, following an initiative from
KDP leader Masoud Barzani to resolve political tensions in Iraq’s
ongoing government formation process.
The meeting at Sadr’s house came following a statement from Masoud Barzani on Monday where he suggested that Nechirvan Barzani and Halbousi visit Sadr in order to discuss the political process in Iraq, and to eliminate the obstacles and issues.
The Sadrist bloc has already formed an alliance with the KDP and Halbousi’s Sunni party, Taqadum. Their initial act of alliance was during the first parliamentary session earlier this month where all three parties voted for each other’s candidates for the parliamentary speaker position and his deputies.
The sudden meeting between the three leaders comes after Iran’s Quds
Force commander Ismael Qaani accompanied by Iran’s top official in Iraq,
Hassan Danaeifar, met with Masoud Barzani in Erbil on Sunday, as
confirmed to Rudaw by the KDP’s spokesperson.
Meanwhile, Parliament has announced 25 names for the post of President of Iraq. INA reports the candidates are:
1-Khalid Siddiq Aziz Mohammed
2-Faisal Mohsen Aboud Al-Kilabi
3-Shehab Ahmed Abdullah Al Nuaimi
4-Hussein Ahmed Hashim Al- Safi
5-Ahmed Moah U mran Al - Rubaie
6-Ahmed Yahya Jassim Jawd Al Saadi
7-Sabah Saleh Saeed
8-Kazim Khudair Abbas Dwaghneh
9-Razkar Mohammed Amin Hama Saeed
10-Klawes Ali Amin Birah
11-Louay Abdel Sahib Abdul Wahab Mohsen
12-Ribwar Orhmen Arif
13-Hamza Brissam Thijeel Al-Maamouri
14-Hushiar Mahmoud Mohamed Mustafa Zebari
15-Hussein Mohsen Alwan Al - Hassani
16-Abdul Latif Mohammed Jamal Rashid Sheikh Mohammed
17-Omar Sadiq Mustafa Majid Al-Abdali
18-Barham Ahmed Haj Saleh Ahmed
19-Thaer Ghanim Mohammed Ali Baktish Al - Othman
20-Iqbal Abdullah Amin al-Fatlawi
21-Khadija Khuda Yakhish Assad Qlaws
22-Jabbar Hassan Jassim
23-Hadi Abdel Hussein Saddam Al - Freijy
24-Raad Khudair Dafag Sail
25-Omid Abdel Salam Qadir Taha Palan
Number 18 should be forgotten. He has served as president and should step aside. Was there any real point to wasting time, money and security on elections if Barham Saleh is going to remain president? The Speaker of Parliament remained the same. Now the presidency?
In addition, there's the fact that Saleh's political party, PUK, was destroyed in the elections. Why should he remain president? Corruption? That's why?
The Iraqi people became disenchanted with elections in 2010 when Joe Biden overturned the results that year with The Erbil Agreement. Nothing since has taken place to make them believe that elecitons change anything. Keeping Saleh as president will only further undermine any belief in elections. Grasp that every election since 2010 has seen a steady decline in turnout.
February 8th. Per Iraq's Constitution, that's the date that they have to have named a president. That's days away.
Nothing is being accomplished. The plan was that the new government would usher out foreign forces. You may remember all the claims, for example, that US troops would be out of Iraq at the end of 2021. Didn't happen. The election didn't deliver that or anything else. And for those who just don't seem to get it, ABNA reports:
The German parliament has approved a plan to extend the German army’s mission in Iraq until October 2022.
On Friday (January 28th), the German parliament, known as the Bundestag, approved by 553 votes to 110 against the proposal of the federal government to extend the mission of the German army in Iraq until October 2022. Accordingly, the German army will continue to participate in anti-ISIS missions in Iraq for nine months.
The German parliament said in a statement that Germany’s cooperation and presence is only to strengthen and rebuild the Iraqi army and provide related support services as part of NATO’s missions and the International Coalition against ISIS in Iraq.
The German government believes that the efforts of various parties to implement structural reforms in the Iraqi military institutions as well as the integration of the forces of the Hashad al-Shaabi organization in the Iraqi security structures with the aim of effective and direct control of its forces by the Iraqi government should be supported!
These words of the German government show that the Westerners are seeking the dissolution of the Hashad al-Shaabi organization and will certainly implement plans to strike at the organization in the near future.
On Julian Assange, we'll note this discussion.
And we'll wind down with this:
MORE THAN A MAGAZINE, A MOVEMENT
Enjoy this newsletter? Forward to a friend!
1600 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, VA 22209
The following sites updated: