Tuesday, January 7, 2025

Michelle Buteau stands strong (Chappelle and Kevin Hart embarass)

Michelle Buteau is someone I think most people know.  She's a stand up comedian and an actress.  Wikipedia notes:


In 2019, Buteau appeared in the movies: Someone GreatIsn't It RomanticSell By, and Always Be My Maybe.[18] She also began hosting the WNYC podcast, Adulting, with co-host Jordan Carlos.[19][20][21] That same year, Buteau appeared in two television series: First Wives Club[12] and Tales of the City. In 2020, Buteau started hosting The Circle, a reality TV show on Netflix.

In 2020, Buteau published her first book, a collection of personal essays titled Survival of the Thickest, with Gallery Books, an imprint of Simon & Schuster.[22] A TV adaptation of the memoir premiered in 2023 on Netflix.[23]

Buteau's Michelle Buteau: Welcome to Buteaupia won a 2021 Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Comedy Special.[24]

Buteau was cast with a prominent role in the 2024 film Babes directed by Pamela Adlon. Buteau played the role of Dawn, the main character's best friend.[25] Buteau starred in the animated film Fixed.[26]



In “Michelle Buteau: A Buteau-ful Mind at Radio City Music Hall,” which debuted New Year’s Eve on Netflix, Buteau, the first female comedian to headline a special at the famed New York venue, meticulously takes aim at a number of cultural and political issues. From describing a random encounter with a racist white woman at a reptile sanctuary to explaining her realization that dogs have more reproductive rights than she does, Buteau’s set embodies what makes her approach to comedy so refreshing. She’s insightful and hilarious. She makes her audiences laugh and interrogate the world and themselves — and she achieves this perfect blend without ever punching down.

That’s a lesson other comedians should take from “A Buteau-ful Mind.” Exceptional comedy can be welcoming and bright rather than exclusionary and hate-filled. Instead of targeting vulnerable populations and then saying “it’s just comedy” to shield oneself from criticism, Buteau, leaning into the art form’s radical roots, calls out social ills and those perpetuating them. And she calls out comedian Dave Chappelle by name for his tireless crusade against trans people.

After telling a raunchy joke about her lesbian friend, whom she calls the “oracle,” Buteau paused to reflect on what she’d just done. “For the most part, we laughed,” she tells the audience. “What I’m saying is it can be done. It can be done. We can tell jokes and stories and not disparage a whole community. We can do that; we can make it funny. You just have to work at it, right? So, if you guys ever run into Dave Chappelle, can you let him know that s---?”


Chappelle’s last two Netflix specials, “The Closer” (2021) and “The Dreamer” (2023), are, in a word, transphobic. He spends significant time in each routine railing against trans people for existing and comparing the plights of Black people and LGBTQ people — as if Black LGBTQ people don’t exist. Chappelle declares himself a member of “Team TERF,” a phrase used to describe virulent anti-trans activists, including J.K. Rowling, who are committed to eradicating the “concept” of transness.


Dave has been such a disappointment.  I first saw him in You've Got Mail.  A number of us at work went to see it when it came out and this one woman, Donna, gets all excited when Tom Hanks and Dave are talking. "Oh," she leans in to tell the rest of us, "I've missed Jimmy Walker."

Jimmy Walker?  Jimmy Walker!  

I wanted to say, "White girl, he's at least 20 years too young to be Jimmy Walker."  I wanted to say, "Do we all look alike to you?" 

Instead, I just ignored her.

But Dave has been funny over the years.  Then he had his nonsense with Comedy Central.  And that's all that was.  Oh, it's so painful for me that these shows are streaming!!! B.S.  As soon as he started getting paid more for the streaming, he stopped whining, didn't he?

But that mental break?  I don't think he ever recovered from it.  I also know that his audience gets older and older at each performance.  Young people no longer make up the bulk of his shows.  Now that he's a transphobe and a homophobe, he gets those angry White middle aged and older people.


He really is an embarrassment to the Black community at this point.  

The article notes:


In 2022, John Mulaney had Chappelle open for him during a show in Ohio, and as to be expected, Chappelle told both homophobic and transphobic jokes. After Chappelle’s set, Mulaney came onstage and embraced him. In defense of Chappelle, Kevin Hart, who lost his gig to host the 2019 Academy Awards after homophobic tweets resurfaced, told The Independent that “you have the option of just not watching someone you don’t find funny or entertaining.”

There’s been one noticeable exception to the chorus of praise: While Katt Williams doesn’t appear to have publicly criticized Chappelle by name, when he appeared on “Club Shay Shay” last year, he did note that comedians must evolve with the times. “There are words we can use for a while until someone says, ‘That ain’t a good word. … That don’t make people feel good.’ And we stop saying the word,” he said. “There are things you can say to get your point that don’t have to hurt people.” It should be that simple, but instead, Chappelle has resisted the cultural push by trans people to be respected rather than treated as punchlines.



John Mulaney?  When that's your support, you may as well drown.  He's garbage who faked his stage act and persona and it all fell apart.  Now he's just an ugly, fat man.  Kevin is right -- if you don't find someone funny or entertain, you don't have to watch.  And that's why I don't watch Kevin Hart films.  I remember when they were damned determined to make Kevin Hart happen as a film star and I remember he had one flop film after another The Wedding Ringer (64 million in the US), About Last Night (48 million in the US), Night School (73 million), Fatherhood (a film that they decided to release to streaming at the last minute because it was so awful), The Man From Toronto (film release repeatedly postponed then finally released on home video because it was so bad), Me Time (see previous parentheticals) -- and then he finally gets a film into theaters, Borderlands, last year and no one goes to see it.  $160 million minimum to shoot and advertise and it only makes $15 million in ticket sales.

So, yeah, Kevin's right we do "have the option of just not watching someone you don't find funny or entertaining" and we prove that by avoiding Kevin's garbage.  


Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


Tuesday, January 7, 2025.  Senator Patty Murray notes the cap on prescription drugs, Donald Chump whines and whines, one of his lackeys lies for him (how is that different from any other day), BLUESKY and much more.


Let's start off with BLUESKY.  Ryan Cooper (TAP) reports:

One bright spot in the bleak year of 2024 was the rise of Bluesky. As someone who relied greatly on Twitter for news and my career—OK, I may have been somewhat addicted—before Elon Musk bought it and turned it into a snake pit of neo-Nazi filth, it was nice to see a Twitter-like replacement rise to relative prominence.

I joined in April 2023 as about the 47,000th user. Today, Bluesky has about 26 million users, and seems to be growing healthily. It actually has some notable improvements on Twitter, like the “starter pack” function where users can put together a group of accounts that one can follow at once (here’s the starter pack for Prospect writers, incidentally), or the “nuclear block” where if one participant in a conversation blocks the other, the entire conversation is zapped. This greatly cuts down on Twitter’s culture of aggressive pile-ons and abuse.

Unlike any other big platform, Bluesky does not censor posts with outgoing links. Indeed, it does not have any proprietary “for you” algorithm, instead defaulting to a traditional reverse-chronological feed, and allowing users to pick from algorithms that can be developed by others. This has major implications for publishers: Despite its modest size, The Guardian reports that Bluesky traffic has already outstripped that from Twitter, and here at the Prospect Bluesky traffic now regularly matches Twitter and is many times that of Facebook.

This ability to share outside the platform is proving so popular that Facebook’s Twitter clone, Threads, has belatedly altered its algorithm to include more posts from accounts you follow in an attempt to compete. And this disruption is being done on a shoestring budget—Bluesky has just 20 employees and about $23 million in funding, as compared to Meta’s 70,000+ workers and $156 billion in annual revenue.

It’s strong evidence that there is a large unmet demand for internet systems outside of the control of Big Tech monopolists. I don’t know if there can be a similar option for every walled garden on the internet—it’s hard to dislodge a giant—but there’s no question that there’s a lot of pent-up demand.


You can find out a lot on BLUESKY.







David Sirota's always a dirty fool.  Whether attacking the mother of an Iraq War veterans for speaking out against the Iraq War (and against the senator David worked for) or threatening us here because we pointed out what David left out when he attacked Tina in the column -- that the senator she was confronting was David's mentor and former boss.  Sort of a basic disclosure required in journalism but David thinks he makes up his own rules.

He has a filthy mouth and a lazy brain and that's why, when he was wrongly nominated for an Academy Award (for co-writing a piece of crap), I attended every event ahead of voting to make sure he didn't get the award -- I attended and took along printed copies of the nasty, threatening, bullying e-mail he sent me.  

It really exposed the true side of him to people who, like most of the world, would otherwise not even know his name.

POST-LEFT WATCH is on BLUESKY.  We've noted them for a couple of months now.  They're someone to watch and follow.  They call out the crazy.  






Isn't it great when a White man -- especially a liar like Christian -- wants to tell us about the targeting of a Black man and to explain it wasn't like what we thought it was.

He's such a damn liar and such a damn disgrace to his father.  He's also a closeted Socialist but, remember, we're never supposed to talk about that.

So there he was on Jimmy Dore rewriting history like only a Democrat hating Socialist can.  

It's hard for me to think of his nonsense without thinking of THE NEW YORK TIMES which launched a huge attack against Dr King and did so long before The Poor People's Campaign of 1968.  THE NEW YORK TIMES not only attacked him repeatedly -- and is corporate media, therefore a corporation -- but continued to attack and to denigrate him long after he was dead.

And they carried the attacks over onto Coretta. When she died, please remember, NYT had 'playwright' (she was not that good and she certainly wasn't worthy of more attention than Coretta Scott King) on the front page, ran three or so columns on her passing, did an editorial on her, blah blah blah, it never ended.  

"Why are you attacking me?"

That's what the paper's sole Black columnist at the time asked me.

Well, golly gee, you're Black and you have space on the op-ed pages and you're ignoring the fact that the paper is refusing to run columns -- because there were submissions by big name Black academics -- about Coretta's passing.  You're on the op-ed pages and you're writing garbage columns when you could be highlighting a pioneering Black woman who fought for a better America for all and continued her husband's legacy after he was assassianted.

The guilt trip got Coretta into a column by Bob.  Got her into it.  It wasn't about her.  But he worked in for two or three paragraphs.

And of course, Christian brings up the truth and the lies of NYT.

Put him on a minor media program with a small audience and he's telling the audience about how Dexter Filkins and John F Burns (NYT 'reporters') really were in the Green Zone.  Dexter especially did whatever the US military told him.  That included, Christian said on air, cancelling interviews when the US military conveyed that they'd prefer he not speak to this or that person.  

Now if he was going on something mainstream, he'd say exactly the opposite.  And of course when he was on an in-between program, he'd justify Dexy with comments like, 'The Dexter Filkins on the pages of THE NEW YORK TIMES is not the Dexter Filkins in Baghdad' -- meaning that it was the paper's problem and not Dexter bad journalism.

For those who don't know, our first weekend online back in 2004 called out Dexter for lies in print.  He won awards for those lies.  Is my face red?  No.  Because he covered up War Crimes with that article.  He covered them up.  They're known now but everyone looks the other way.  In 40 years, people will be calling for the dead reporter to be stripped of the prizes for his lying.

In forty years when it no longer matters.

But don't expect Christian to tell you any of that.  

On Iraq, this may be our last Iraq snapshot and the title may change to snapshot tomorrow.  I need to check.  Don't have time this second because we have other things still to cover.

BLUESKY is where it's happening.  

TWITTER is for elderly hate mongers -- like Katrina vanden Heuvel of THE NATION who led the attacks on Kamala.  But TWITTER's not the only cesspool.  Travis Gettys (RAW STORY) explains:

Facebook's parent company will make changes to its fact-checking to more closely resemble the site formerly known as Twitter.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced Tuesday morning that content moderation and other restrictions on speech would be lifted across Facebook, Instagram and other platforms as Donald Trump returns to the White House, reported Fox News.

"We’re going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies and restoring free expression on our platforms," Zuckerberg said in a video posted Tuesday morning. "More specifically, we’re going to get rid of fact-checkers and replace them with Community Notes similar to X, starting in the U.S."

The company's third-party fact-checking program was put into place following Trump's first election win to "manage content" and misinformation on its platforms, which executives conceded was the result of "political pressure," but they now say that system has "gone too far."


In other news, Convicted Felon Donald Chump is still being a big titty baby because he's the continual disappointment that his father loathed and he's the man that could never satisfy Ivana.  He's just an immature jerk who never grew up and never stopped to grasp that there were other people on the earth and that they had feelings and the right to expect to be recognized.  Chump doesn't want to appear in person or via the internet on January 10th when he is to be sentenced.  His howler monkey Steven Cheung (who at 42 looks 97) declared, "The American People elected President Trump with an overwhelming mandate that demands an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and all of the remaining Witch Hunts."  Chump lied on official documents.  There's no excuse for that and he can't pardon himself because it's not federal.  Chump is a sleazy, two-bit crook and that's what the record is going to reflect this week and forever more.

As for a mandate?


No, Steven, the American people didn't give him a mandate.

As Elaine noted Friday, there is no mandate.  1.8% isn't a mandate.  That's all Chump won by.  Ronald Reagan in 1984?  He got a mandate.  LBJ in 1964?  He got a mandate.

Convicted Felon?  He squeaked by with 1.8% more votes.  That's not a mandate.  See Elaine's "Can they stop lying about the 2024 election?"

Steven's clearly confused.  Must be overwork, right?  Can't be personal since he has no personal life.




 
 
 So it's work that consumes him.  And let us be the first to reveal his heretofore never discussed acting career.  For several years, Steven has appeared on the series AMERICAN DAD.



Don't know about you, but I think the jewels really make his eyes pop.


Speaking of idiots, Evan Williams (TAG24 NEWS) reports on one, "Republican Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman had to be shamed into agreeing to lower US flags to half-mast in honor of the late ex-president Jimmy Carter."  And now note this from the article:


Blakeman's original decision was seen as a response to rants made by Trump on Truth Social last week.

In response to the US flag potentially being left at half-mast during his inauguration, Trump said that Democrats "don't love our country" and are "giddy."

"In any event, because of the death of President Jimmy Carter, the Flag may, for the first time ever during an Inauguration of a future President, be at half-mast," Trump said.



Democrats don't love our country?  


He was never fit to be president.  He's a mad sociopath who is not fit to represent the American people and who only knows how to sew division.

Which makes him the ultimate LOVE CONNECTION for Elon Musk, right?


Yesterday was many things including the fourth year anniversary of the treasonous attack on our country.  Rachel Maddow addressed that last night on MSNBC.




Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:

70,000+ seniors in Washington state, 4.5 million seniors nationwide will save hundreds or thousands of dollars each year thanks to the new annual cap on out-of-pocket prescription drug costs for folks on Medicare Part D

***PHOTOS AND B-ROLL OF THURSDAY’S PRESS CONFERENCE AVAILABLE HERE***

In case you missed it: on January 1, a new provision that Democrats in Congress got signed into law went into effect, capping out-of-pocket prescription drug costs for seniors with a Medicare prescription drug plan at $2,000 a year. On Thursday, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member and former Chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, joined U.S. Representative Kim Schrier, M.D. (D-WA-08) at Northaven Senior Living in Seattle to highlight the new costs savings for millions of seniors.

The new cap is thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act Democrats passed through Congress in 2022—that every single Republican voted against—and it means millions of seniors will pay significantly less for their prescription drugs this year, lowering costs for families and giving them more breathing room.

“Starting January 1st, anyone with a Medicare prescription drug plan—also known as Medicare Part D—now has their out-of-pocket drug costs capped at two thousand dollars each year. That’s because of a law Democrats passed—the Inflation Reduction Act—that did all sorts of things to lower health care costs and make it cheaper and easier for folks to get the medications they need,” said Senator Murray. “As everyone knows, high drug prices come with other painful costs—like stress over how to make ends meet, or what bills to skip, in order to fill a prescription, or whether to take the risk of rationing medication. These are impossible choices that no one should ever have to make. But they’re the reality for so many people, and so many seniors especially. And make no mistake, when prescription drugs are too expensive for people to afford—that’s dangerous. Because even the best, most effective medication can’t do someone any good if they can’t afford to get it.”

Medicare Part D—a voluntary program that helps pay for prescription drugs for people with Medicare—provides prescription drug coverage for nearly 56 million Americans. More than 4.5 million older Americans enrolled in Part D are estimated to benefit from the new out-of-pocket spending cap that took effect January 1, 2025. Approximately 1.4 million Part D enrollees who reach the new out-of-pocket cap between 2025 and 2029 will see annual savings of $1,000 or more, and just over 420,000 will see savings of more than $3,000. In Washington state, at least 70,000 seniors are expected to see these new savings—nearly $1,900 in 2025—and that number will steadily increase over time.

The $2,000 annual cap is just one of the many actions Democrats took to lower prescription drug costs in the Inflation Reduction Act. Most notably, the law capped the cost of insulin for patients on Medicare at $35/month—which went into effect January 1, 2023—and it empowered Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices for the first time ever.

  • In August, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced negotiated drug prices for ten commonly-used drugs in the first cycle of negotiations. The new, lower negotiated prices will go into effect on January 1, 2026, and will lower the prices people pay for some of the most common and expensive prescription drugs that treat heart disease, cancer, diabetes, blood clots, and more.
  • Allowing Medicare to negotiate prescription drug costs is expected to save American taxpayers $6 billion, with people enrolled in Medicare expected to save $1.5 billion in out-of-pocket costs in 2026 alone. 15 to 20 more drugs will be added to the negotiating table every year moving forward – all thanks to Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act.

See coverage of the landmark new prescription drug cap below:

Fox 13: Medicare prescription drug costs capped at $2,000 annually

Seniors on Medicare Part D will never pay more than $2,000 out-of-pocket for prescription drugs annually, thanks to a provision in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act which takes effect this year. The new benefit for seniors on Medicare Part D will cap out-of-pocket prescription drug costs at $2,000 per year. Once they reach this dollar amount, they will automatically receive “catastrophic coverage,” which means all out-of-pocket costs for Part D drugs will be covered through the rest of the year. […]

In Washington state alone, 70,000 enrollees will save nearly $1,900 in 2025, with the number of beneficiaries growing over time.

“[It’s] a change that will save millions of people, hundreds or thousands of dollars on their prescription medications, every year from now on,” said U.S. Senator Patty Murray, who is a senior member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. “There is more to this story than just numbers—because as everyone knows, high drug prices come with other painful costs. Like stress over how to make ends meet, or what bills to skip, in order to fill a prescription, or whether to take the risk of rationing medication.” […]

“This cap means I can afford my medications without having to cut back on essentials like food or utilities,” said Katherine O’Hara, a local senior who is on Medicare.

Stephan Gerhardt, who lives with dystonia and degenerative disc disease, also praised the change.

“One of my anti-inflammatory medications isn’t covered by my insurance, but luckily, it only costs $45 a bottle and lasts six months,” Gerhardt said. “I’m fortunate compared to others.”

Gerhardt, who has been on Medicare for over a decade due to his disabilities, said the new law will help many seniors in his community avoid tough choices between essential needs.

“People I know often have to decide: ‘Do I eat, pay rent, or take my meds?’” said Gerhardt. “Almost everybody will choose to pay rent because they can’t survive being homeless; and then it’s, ‘How do I figure out food?’”

“This is life-changing for folks who can’t afford their medications,” said Gerhardt. “It reduces the strain on individuals and the healthcare system. If people can afford their medications, they’re less likely to end up in emergency rooms, which costs everyone more in the long run.”

Despite the bipartisan benefits, every Republican in Congress voted against the Inflation Reduction Act, a point highlighted by Murray. She warned of potential future efforts to repeal the law.

“This is about making life more affordable and ensuring no one has to risk their health because they can’t afford medication,” Murray said. “The President-Elect has talked about cutting everything, so he’s got everything in front of him, and we’re going to make sure this is not one he goes after.”

KING 5: Prescription drug costs now capped at $2,000 a year for some Washington seniors on Medicare

Sen. Patty Murray held a press conference Thursday in light of a cap on prescription drug costs for some on Medicare going into effect.

Out-of-pocket costs for prescription medications will be capped at $2,000 a year for seniors on Medicare Part D. Part D is a voluntary program that pays for prescription drug medication that covers nearly 56 million Americans.

The change was included in the Inflation Reduction Act that was passed in Congress in August of 2022. […]

“As everyone knows, high drug prices cause other painful costs, like stress over how to make ends meet, or what bills they needed to skip in order to take a prescription, or whether to take the risk of rationing medication,” Murray said. “Those are impossible choices that no one should ever have to make, but they’re the reality for many people and many seniors.”

Other provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act also take aim at drug costs for people with Medicare. The cost of insulin is capped at $35 a month and recommended vaccines like the flu, shingles, COVID-19 and RSV are free to everyone with Medicare Part D, according to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

###




The following sites updated:

No comments: