In 2020, Buteau published her first book, a collection of personal essays titled Survival of the Thickest, with Gallery Books, an imprint of Simon & Schuster.[22] A TV adaptation of the memoir premiered in 2023 on Netflix.[23]
Buteau was cast with a prominent role in the 2024 film Babes directed by Pamela Adlon. Buteau played the role of Dawn, the main character's best friend.[25] Buteau starred in the animated film Fixed.[26]
In “Michelle Buteau: A Buteau-ful Mind at Radio City Music Hall,” which debuted New Year’s Eve on Netflix, Buteau, the first female comedian to headline a
special at the famed New York venue, meticulously takes aim at a number
of cultural and political issues. From describing a random encounter
with a racist white woman at a reptile sanctuary to explaining her
realization that dogs have more reproductive rights than she does,
Buteau’s set embodies what makes her approach to comedy so refreshing.
She’s insightful and hilarious. She makes her audiences laugh and
interrogate the world and themselves — and she achieves this perfect
blend without ever punching down.
That’s
a lesson other comedians should take from “A Buteau-ful Mind.”
Exceptional comedy can be welcoming and bright rather than exclusionary
and hate-filled. Instead of targeting vulnerable populations and then
saying “it’s just comedy” to shield oneself from criticism, Buteau,
leaning into the art form’s radical roots,
calls out social ills and those perpetuating them. And she calls out
comedian Dave Chappelle by name for his tireless crusade against trans
people.
After
telling a raunchy joke about her lesbian friend, whom she calls the
“oracle,” Buteau paused to reflect on what she’d just done. “For the
most part, we laughed,” she tells the audience. “What I’m saying is it
can be done. It can be done. We can tell jokes and stories and not
disparage a whole community. We can do that; we can make it funny. You
just have to work at it, right? So, if you guys ever run into Dave
Chappelle, can you let him know that s---?”
Chappelle’s last two Netflix specials,
“The Closer” (2021) and “The Dreamer” (2023), are, in a word,
transphobic. He spends significant time in each routine railing against
trans people for existing and comparing the plights of Black people and
LGBTQ people — as if Black LGBTQ people don’t exist. Chappelle declares
himself a member of “Team TERF,” a phrase used to describe virulent
anti-trans activists, including J.K. Rowling, who are committed to eradicating the “concept” of transness.
Dave
has been such a disappointment. I first saw him in You've Got Mail. A
number of us at work went to see it when it came out and this one
woman, Donna, gets all excited when Tom Hanks and Dave are talking.
"Oh," she leans in to tell the rest of us, "I've missed Jimmy Walker."
Jimmy Walker? Jimmy Walker!
I
wanted to say, "White girl, he's at least 20 years too young to be
Jimmy Walker." I wanted to say, "Do we all look alike to you?"
Instead, I just ignored her.
But
Dave has been funny over the years. Then he had his nonsense with
Comedy Central. And that's all that was. Oh, it's so painful for me
that these shows are streaming!!! B.S. As soon as he started getting
paid more for the streaming, he stopped whining, didn't he?
But
that mental break? I don't think he ever recovered from it. I also
know that his audience gets older and older at each performance. Young
people no longer make up the bulk of his shows. Now that he's a
transphobe and a homophobe, he gets those angry White middle aged and
older people.
He really is an embarrassment to the Black community at this point.
The article notes:
In 2022, John Mulaney had Chappelle open for him during
a show in Ohio, and as to be expected, Chappelle told both homophobic
and transphobic jokes. After Chappelle’s set, Mulaney came onstage and
embraced him. In defense of Chappelle, Kevin Hart, who lost his gig to host the 2019 Academy Awards after homophobic tweets resurfaced, told The Independent that “you have the option of just not watching someone you don’t find funny or entertaining.”
There’s
been one noticeable exception to the chorus of praise: While Katt
Williams doesn’t appear to have publicly criticized Chappelle by name,
when he appeared on “Club Shay Shay” last
year, he did note that comedians must evolve with the times. “There are
words we can use for a while until someone says, ‘That ain’t a good
word. … That don’t make people feel good.’ And we stop saying the word,”
he said. “There are things you can say to get your point that don’t
have to hurt people.” It should be that simple, but instead, Chappelle
has resisted the cultural push by trans people to be respected rather
than treated as punchlines.
John
Mulaney? When that's your support, you may as well drown. He's
garbage who faked his stage act and persona and it all fell apart. Now
he's just an ugly, fat man. Kevin is right -- if you don't find someone
funny or entertain, you don't have to watch. And that's why I don't
watch Kevin Hart films. I remember when they were damned determined to
make Kevin Hart happen as a film star and I remember he had one flop
film after another The Wedding Ringer (64 million in the US), About Last
Night (48 million in the US), Night School (73 million), Fatherhood (a
film that they decided to release to streaming at the last minute
because it was so awful), The Man From Toronto (film release repeatedly
postponed then finally released on home video because it was so bad), Me
Time (see previous parentheticals) -- and then he finally gets a film
into theaters, Borderlands, last year and no one goes to see it. $160
million minimum to shoot and advertise and it only makes $15 million in
ticket sales.
So, yeah,
Kevin's right we do "have the option of just not watching someone you
don't find funny or entertaining" and we prove that by avoiding Kevin's
garbage.
Tuesday, January 7, 2025. Senator Patty Murray notes the cap on
prescription drugs, Donald Chump whines and whines, one of his lackeys
lies for him (how is that different from any other day), BLUESKY and
much more.
One bright spot in the bleak year of 2024 was the rise
of Bluesky. As someone who relied greatly on Twitter for news and my
career—OK, I may have been somewhat addicted—before Elon Musk bought it
and turned it into a snake pit of neo-Nazi filth, it was nice to see a
Twitter-like replacement rise to relative prominence.
I joined in April 2023 as about the 47,000th user. Today, Bluesky has about 26 million users,
and seems to be growing healthily. It actually has some notable
improvements on Twitter, like the “starter pack” function where users
can put together a group of accounts that one can follow at once (here’s
the starter pack for Prospect writers,
incidentally), or the “nuclear block” where if one participant in a
conversation blocks the other, the entire conversation is zapped. This
greatly cuts down on Twitter’s culture of aggressive pile-ons and abuse.
Unlike any other big platform, Bluesky does not censor posts with
outgoing links. Indeed, it does not have any proprietary “for you”
algorithm, instead defaulting to a traditional reverse-chronological
feed, and allowing users to pick from algorithms that can be developed
by others. This has major implications for publishers: Despite its
modest size, The Guardianreports that Bluesky traffic has already outstripped that from Twitter, and here at the Prospect Bluesky traffic now regularly matches Twitter and is many times that of Facebook.
This ability to share outside the platform is proving so popular that Facebook’s Twitter clone, Threads, has belatedly altered its algorithm
to include more posts from accounts you follow in an attempt to
compete. And this disruption is being done on a shoestring
budget—Bluesky has just 20 employees and about $23 million in funding, as compared to Meta’s 70,000+ workers and $156 billion in annual revenue.
It’s strong evidence that there is a large unmet demand for internet
systems outside of the control of Big Tech monopolists. I don’t know if
there can be a similar option for every walled garden on the
internet—it’s hard to dislodge a giant—but there’s no question that
there’s a lot of pent-up demand.
You can find out a lot on BLUESKY.
David Sirota's always a dirty fool.
Whether attacking the mother of an Iraq War veterans for speaking out
against the Iraq War (and against the senator David worked for) or
threatening us here because we pointed out what David left out when he
attacked Tina in the column -- that the senator she was confronting was
David's mentor and former boss. Sort of a basic disclosure required in
journalism but David thinks he makes up his own rules.
He
has a filthy mouth and a lazy brain and that's why, when he was wrongly
nominated for an Academy Award (for co-writing a piece of crap), I
attended every event ahead of voting to make sure he didn't get the
award -- I attended and took along printed copies of the nasty,
threatening, bullying e-mail he sent me.
It really exposed the true side of him to people who, like most of the world, would otherwise not even know his name.
POST-LEFT
WATCH is on BLUESKY. We've noted them for a couple of months now.
They're someone to watch and follow. They call out the crazy.
Isn't it great when a White man
-- especially a liar like Christian -- wants to tell us about the
targeting of a Black man and to explain it wasn't like what we thought
it was.
He's such a damn liar and such a damn
disgrace to his father. He's also a closeted Socialist but, remember,
we're never supposed to talk about that.
So there he was on Jimmy Dore rewriting history like only a Democrat hating Socialist can.
It's
hard for me to think of his nonsense without thinking of THE NEW YORK
TIMES which launched a huge attack against Dr King and did so long
before The Poor People's Campaign of 1968. THE NEW YORK TIMES not only
attacked him repeatedly -- and is corporate media, therefore a
corporation -- but continued to attack and to denigrate him long after
he was dead.
And they carried the attacks over
onto Coretta. When she died, please remember, NYT had 'playwright' (she
was not that good and she certainly wasn't worthy of more attention than
Coretta Scott King) on the front page, ran three or so columns on her
passing, did an editorial on her, blah blah blah, it never ended.
"Why are you attacking me?"
That's what the paper's sole Black columnist at the time asked me.
Well,
golly gee, you're Black and you have space on the op-ed pages and
you're ignoring the fact that the paper is refusing to run columns --
because there were submissions by big name Black academics -- about
Coretta's passing. You're on the op-ed pages and you're writing garbage
columns when you could be highlighting a pioneering Black woman who
fought for a better America for all and continued her husband's legacy
after he was assassianted.
The guilt trip got
Coretta into a column by Bob. Got her into it. It wasn't about her.
But he worked in for two or three paragraphs.
And of course, Christian brings up the truth and the lies of NYT.
Put
him on a minor media program with a small audience and he's telling the
audience about how Dexter Filkins and John F Burns (NYT 'reporters')
really were in the Green Zone. Dexter especially did whatever the US
military told him. That included, Christian said on air, cancelling
interviews when the US military conveyed that they'd prefer he not speak
to this or that person.
Now if he was going
on something mainstream, he'd say exactly the opposite. And of course
when he was on an in-between program, he'd justify Dexy with comments
like, 'The Dexter Filkins on the pages of THE NEW YORK TIMES is not the
Dexter Filkins in Baghdad' -- meaning that it was the paper's problem
and not Dexter bad journalism.
For those who
don't know, our first weekend online back in 2004 called out Dexter for
lies in print. He won awards for those lies. Is my face red? No.
Because he covered up War Crimes with that article. He covered them
up. They're known now but everyone looks the other way. In 40 years,
people will be calling for the dead reporter to be stripped of the
prizes for his lying.
In forty years when it no longer matters.
But don't expect Christian to tell you any of that.
On
Iraq, this may be our last Iraq snapshot and the title may change to
snapshot tomorrow. I need to check. Don't have time this second
because we have other things still to cover.
BLUESKY is where it's happening.
TWITTER
is for elderly hate mongers -- like Katrina vanden Heuvel of THE NATION
who led the attacks on Kamala. But TWITTER's not the only cesspool. Travis Gettys (RAW STORY) explains:
Facebook's parent company will make changes to its fact-checking to more closely resemble the site formerly known as Twitter.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced Tuesday morning that content
moderation and other restrictions on speech would be lifted across
Facebook, Instagram and other platforms as Donald Trump returns to the White House, reported Fox News.
"We’re
going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes,
simplifying our policies and restoring free expression on our
platforms," Zuckerberg said in a video
posted Tuesday morning. "More specifically, we’re going to get rid of
fact-checkers and replace them with Community Notes similar to X,
starting in the U.S."
The company's third-party fact-checking program was put into place
following Trump's first election win to "manage content" and
misinformation on its platforms, which executives conceded was the
result of "political pressure," but they now say that system has "gone
too far."
In other news, Convicted Felon Donald Chump is still being a big titty
baby because he's the continual disappointment that his father loathed
and he's the man that could never satisfy Ivana. He's just an immature
jerk who never grew up and never stopped to grasp that there were other
people on the earth and that they had feelings and the right to expect
to be recognized. Chump doesn't want to appear in person or via the
internet on January 10th when he is to be sentenced. His howler monkey
Steven Cheung (who at 42 looks 97) declared, "The American People
elected President Trump with an overwhelming mandate that demands an
immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and
all of the remaining Witch Hunts." Chump lied on official documents.
There's no excuse for that and he can't pardon himself because it's not
federal. Chump is a sleazy, two-bit crook and that's what the record is
going to reflect this week and forever more.
As for a mandate?
No, Steven, the American people didn't give him a mandate.
As
Elaine noted Friday, there is no mandate. 1.8% isn't a mandate.
That's all Chump won by. Ronald Reagan in 1984? He got a mandate. LBJ
in 1964? He got a mandate.
Steven's clearly confused. Must be overwork, right? Can't be personal since he has no personal life.
So
it's work that consumes him. And let us be the first to reveal his
heretofore never discussed acting career. For several years, Steven has
appeared on the series AMERICAN DAD.
Don't know about you, but I think the jewels really make his eyes pop.
Speaking of idiots, Evan Williams (TAG24 NEWS) reports on one, "Republican
Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman had to be shamed into agreeing
to lower US flags to half-mast in honor of the late ex-president Jimmy
Carter." And now note this from the article:
Blakeman's original decision was seen as a response to rants made by Trump on Truth Social last week.
In
response to the US flag potentially being left at half-mast during his
inauguration, Trump said that Democrats "don't love our country" and are
"giddy."
"In
any event, because of the death of President Jimmy Carter, the Flag
may, for the first time ever during an Inauguration of a future
President, be at half-mast," Trump said.
Democrats don't love our country?
He
was never fit to be president. He's a mad sociopath who is not fit to
represent the American people and who only knows how to sew division.
Which makes him the ultimate LOVE CONNECTION for Elon Musk, right?
Yesterday
was many things including the fourth year anniversary of the treasonous
attack on our country. Rachel Maddow addressed that last night on
MSNBC.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:
70,000+ seniors in Washington state, 4.5 million seniors
nationwide will save hundreds or thousands of dollars each year thanks
to the new annual cap on out-of-pocket prescription drug costs for folks
on Medicare Part D
***PHOTOS AND B-ROLL OF THURSDAY’S PRESS CONFERENCE AVAILABLE HERE***
In case you missed it: on January 1, a new provision
that Democrats in Congress got signed into law went into effect,
capping out-of-pocket prescription drug costs for seniors with a
Medicare prescription drug plan at $2,000 a year. On Thursday, U.S.
Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member and former Chair of the
Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, joined
U.S. Representative Kim Schrier, M.D. (D-WA-08) at Northaven Senior
Living in Seattle to highlight the new costs savings for millions of
seniors.
The new cap is thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act Democrats
passed through Congress in 2022—that every single Republican voted
against—and it means millions of seniors will pay significantly less for
their prescription drugs this year, lowering costs for families and
giving them more breathing room.
“Starting January 1st, anyone with a Medicare prescription
drug plan—also known as Medicare Part D—now has their out-of-pocket drug
costs capped at two thousand dollars each year. That’s because of a law
Democrats passed—the Inflation Reduction Act—that did all sorts of
things to lower health care costs and make it cheaper and easier for
folks to get the medications they need,” said Senator Murray.“As
everyone knows, high drug prices come with other painful costs—like
stress over how to make ends meet, or what bills to skip, in order to
fill a prescription, or whether to take the risk of rationing
medication. These are impossible choices that no one should ever have to
make. But they’re the reality for so many people, and so many seniors
especially. And make no mistake, when prescription drugs are too
expensive for people to afford—that’s dangerous. Because even the best,
most effective medication can’t do someone any good if they can’t afford
to get it.”
Medicare Part D—a voluntary program that helps pay for prescription
drugs for people with Medicare—provides prescription drug coverage for
nearly 56 million Americans. More than 4.5 million
older Americans enrolled in Part D are estimated to benefit from the
new out-of-pocket spending cap that took effect January 1, 2025.
Approximately 1.4 million Part D enrollees
who reach the new out-of-pocket cap between 2025 and 2029 will see
annual savings of $1,000 or more, and just over 420,000 will see savings
of more than $3,000. In Washington state, at least 70,000 seniors are expected to see these new savings—nearly $1,900 in 2025—and that number will steadily increase over time.
The $2,000 annual cap is just one of the many actions Democrats took to lower prescription drug costs in the Inflation Reduction Act.
Most notably, the law capped the cost of insulin for patients on
Medicare at $35/month—which went into effect January 1, 2023—and it
empowered Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices for the
first time ever.
In August, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced negotiated drug prices
for ten commonly-used drugs in the first cycle of negotiations. The
new, lower negotiated prices will go into effect on January 1, 2026, and
will lower the prices people pay for some of the most common and
expensive prescription drugs that treat heart disease, cancer, diabetes,
blood clots, and more.
Allowing Medicare to negotiate prescription drug costs is expected
to save American taxpayers $6 billion, with people enrolled in Medicare
expected to save $1.5 billion in out-of-pocket costs in 2026 alone. 15
to 20 more drugs will be added to the negotiating table every year
moving forward – all thanks to Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act.
See coverage of the landmark new prescription drug cap below:
Seniors on Medicare Part D will never pay more than $2,000
out-of-pocket for prescription drugs annually, thanks to a provision in
the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act which takes effect this year. The new
benefit for seniors on Medicare Part D will cap out-of-pocket
prescription drug costs at $2,000 per year. Once they reach this dollar
amount, they will automatically receive “catastrophic coverage,” which
means all out-of-pocket costs for Part D drugs will be covered through
the rest of the year. […]
In Washington state alone, 70,000 enrollees will save nearly $1,900 in 2025, with the number of beneficiaries growing over time.
“[It’s] a change that will save millions of people, hundreds or
thousands of dollars on their prescription medications, every year from
now on,” said U.S. Senator Patty Murray, who is a senior member of the
Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. “There is more
to this story than just numbers—because as everyone knows, high drug
prices come with other painful costs. Like stress over how to make ends
meet, or what bills to skip, in order to fill a prescription, or whether
to take the risk of rationing medication.” […]
“This cap means I can afford my medications without having to cut
back on essentials like food or utilities,” said Katherine O’Hara, a
local senior who is on Medicare.
Stephan Gerhardt, who lives with dystonia and degenerative disc disease, also praised the change.
“One of my anti-inflammatory medications isn’t covered by my
insurance, but luckily, it only costs $45 a bottle and lasts six
months,” Gerhardt said. “I’m fortunate compared to others.”
Gerhardt, who has been on Medicare for over a decade due to his
disabilities, said the new law will help many seniors in his community
avoid tough choices between essential needs.
“People I know often have to decide: ‘Do I eat, pay rent, or take my
meds?’” said Gerhardt. “Almost everybody will choose to pay rent because
they can’t survive being homeless; and then it’s, ‘How do I figure out
food?’”
“This is life-changing for folks who can’t afford their medications,”
said Gerhardt. “It reduces the strain on individuals and the healthcare
system. If people can afford their medications, they’re less likely to
end up in emergency rooms, which costs everyone more in the long run.”
Despite the bipartisan benefits, every Republican in Congress voted
against the Inflation Reduction Act, a point highlighted by Murray. She
warned of potential future efforts to repeal the law.
“This is about making life more affordable and ensuring no one has to
risk their health because they can’t afford medication,” Murray said.
“The President-Elect has talked about cutting everything, so he’s got
everything in front of him, and we’re going to make sure this is not one
he goes after.”
Sen. Patty Murray held a press conference Thursday in light of a cap
on prescription drug costs for some on Medicare going into effect.
Out-of-pocket costs for prescription medications will be capped at
$2,000 a year for seniors on Medicare Part D. Part D is a voluntary
program that pays for prescription drug medication that covers nearly 56
million Americans.
The change was included in the Inflation Reduction Act that was passed in Congress in August of 2022. […]
“As everyone knows, high drug prices cause other painful costs, like
stress over how to make ends meet, or what bills they needed to skip in
order to take a prescription, or whether to take the risk of rationing
medication,” Murray said. “Those are impossible choices that no one
should ever have to make, but they’re the reality for many people and
many seniors.”
Other provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act also take aim at drug
costs for people with Medicare. The cost of insulin is capped at $35 a
month and recommended vaccines like the flu, shingles, COVID-19 and RSV
are free to everyone with Medicare Part D, according to U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services.
No comments:
Post a Comment