I'm not calling for banning but YouTube does ban people. I mention that because I'm an African-American lesbian. I don't think YouTube needs to be in the business of recommending homophobic videos to me.
I go to my YouTube home page and see some video by some White man in a priest collar and the title is "Love Is Love Discussion" so I think, sure, stream it. Thinking it's going to be a "We're all God's children" type thing.
We're all God's children -- not that hard of a message. When Whitney Houston was still in the closet and riding high on "It's Not Right But It's Okay" back in the 90s, she could even say that to the camera on MTV when asked what she thought of gay people.
It was bigotry from an idiot. And he won't even own his bigotry. He doesn't believe in equality or science but he does believe gay people are not born that way. Yep, science is not Bigot Mike's friend.
The bigot hides behind God, tries to make God his partner in homophobia. His arguments make as much sense as using God to justify slavery and, for the record, that was done in previous times.
In other LGBTQ news, Queen Latifah came out. Finally came out.
A number of e-mails have asked me about that and why I haven't commented?
I've commented. For years, I've called her out here. She should have come out long ago.
She's finally come out. Good. I hope this makes her life richer and better. Gonna try to give her a grace period of a few months before weighing in any further.
Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Friday, July 9, 2021. In Iraq, what options are on the table? In the US, will military 'justice' ever get the reform it clearly needs?
Just days ago (July 1st), FOREIGN POLICY was insisting that US President Joe Biden was "quietly" attempting "to end the 'forever wars'." Now? It's wondering if Iraq could be the "thorn" in aging lion Joe's paw.
They don't know the half of it.
Barack Obama? Donald Trump? Neither voted for the Iraq War. Both claimed opposition for it and support for it -- in 2004, self-promoting during the Democratic convention, Barack told THE NEW YORK TIMES that if he had been in the Senate, he wasn't sure if he would have voted for the Iraq War -- but neither was a member of Congress.
They could shirk responsibility to a degree -- and both did -- to more than a degree.
Senator for Life Joe Biden voted for it. He used his position to silence criticism of the war before it started and for many years after it started.
Joe is in the unique position of now presiding over a war that he helped start when he was in Congress. No, that's not very common -- in part because past wars usually had an end date of some sort.
The Iraq War? This part of the war began in 2003 and it's already 18 years later.
Joe came into the White House with more experience than anyone before him. Much, much more than Hillary Clinton who was laughably claimed to have been the most experienced candidate ever.
From January of 1973 to January of 2009, Joe served in the US Senate. He then served as Vice President of the United States from January 2009 through January 2017.
All those years of experience don't appear to have mattered much.
He launched an air strike on militias there at the end of last month. It was in response to threats and repeat attacks on US forces and interests in Iraq. While some pretended outrage -- and tried to pretend they knew the law -- they really weren't able to ask the bigger question of what happens after?
The air strike didn't stop the violence -- just look at the attacks this week which have increased and left at least two US service members injured -- and wasn't that the supposed reason for them?
It wasn't a smart move.
Pentagon officials are monitoring the situations in Iraq and Syria with “great concern” after at least five rocket and drone attacks targeted sites used by US personnel in the two countries this week.
“You’ve seen us retaliate appropriately when that safety and security has been threatened,” Pentagon spokesman John Kirby told reporters Thursday.
Three rockets landed near the US Embassy in Baghdad’s Green Zone on Thursday in the latest such incident. No one was reported to have been hurt, but Wednesday two US military personnel were left with what officials described as minor injuries after some 14 rockets slammed into al-Asad Airbase in Iraq’s Anbar province.
The spate of attacks comes just over a week after President Biden authorized precision airstrikes against Iran-linked militia positions in Iraq and Syria for the second time during his presidency. The strikes, which killed four militia members, were designed to end the tit-for-tat violence. They have so far failed to do so.
There are other responses than bomb and bomb again.
And the US has more pull than most want to admit. But they buy into so many lies -- willfully -- like pretending Mustafa al-Kadhimi, in his role as prime minister of Iraq, is actually objecting to the bombing in June because Mustafa issued a statement. He's the prime minister of Iraq. If he wanted US troops out, he could exercise the clause in the agreement. He refuses to do so.
The US Ambassador to Iraq has said that his country will provide $27 million to help Iraq to tackle financial crime. Matthew Tueller explained yesterday that this is part of the UN Development Programme (UNDP) for the country.
"We announced a programme under which the United States of America will provide an amount of $27 million in support for UNDP in the field of training and rehabilitating the Iraqi Supreme Judicial Council, legal bodies and concerned parties for the purpose of confronting financial crimes, so that these bodies can protect the Iraqi financial side and confront corruption," said Tueller at the launch ceremony in Baghdad yesterday.
Again, the US has pull in Iraq. And there are diplomatic measures that could be taken.
As Joe takes a moment to figure out what to do next, hopefully, he will consider all options and not just bomb-and-hope-it-works-differently-this-time.
Turning to the US military, earlier this week, Ann focused on the verdict in a 2017 shooting:
Do you care about gun control? What I do not understand is why there is
always a push for more laws. Seems to me that the problem is more that
the laws aren't enforced. Case in point, Davin Kelley. No, not the
actress. This is the man who shot up the church in Sutherland Springs,
Texas on November 5, 2017. He left 25 people dead another 20 injured.
He never should have had a gun. He was in the military and was 'convicted' while in the Air Force. But military justice thinks it's above the law. So they didn't follow the law, the US military didn't. Though he was convicted of a violent crime by 'military justice' -- domestic violence -- the Air Force did not turn the conviction over to the FBI. Had they done so, he wouldn't have been allowed to have a gun. That was my 'opinion.' Today, that became the way it is because a court ruled. AP reports:
U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez in San Antonio wrote in a ruling signed Wednesday that the Air Force was “60% responsible" for the deaths and injuries at First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs. The attack remains the worst mass shooting in Texas history.
That shooting might not have taken place if the US military had done their job. But that's military 'justice' -- a system that's above the law and lets commanders determine what does and doesn't get punished. You commit a crime, it needs to go to the civilian courts. There is no military 'justice.'
Judge Rodriguez found that Kelley was 40 percent responsible for the shooting while the U.S. government was 60 percent responsible.
The failure to enter the data allowed Kelley to make four separate firearm purchases in preparation for his attack. The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) showed Kelley as eligible to buy such firearms despite his 2012 conviction by a general court martial of domestic assault on his wife and child. That should have made him ineligible.
The court ruled that
“The trial conclusively established that no other individual — not even Kelley’s own parents or partners — knew as much as the United States about the violence that Devin Kelley had threatened to commit and was capable of committing. Moreover, the evidence shows that — had the Government done its job and properly reported Kelley’s information into the background check system — it is more likely than not that Kelley would have been deterred from carrying out the Church shooting.”
The ruling of liability is a major victory for those who want tougher gun enforcement. Such a judgment against a federal agency is exceptionally rare.
The ruling is proof that Senator Kirsten Gillibrand is correct to fight for real reform and real justice when it comes to the US military.
She has been fighting that fight for some time. Yesterday, her office issued the following:
ICYMI: Congressional Black Caucus Endorses The Vanessa Guillén Military Justice Improvement And Increasing Prevention Act
Comprehensive Legislation Would Advance Racial Justice And Protect Survivors
In case you missed it, yesterday, the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) formally endorsed the Vanessa Guillén Military Justice Improvement and Increasing Prevention Act, which would reform the military justice system by moving the decision to prosecute serious crimes in the military from the chain of command to trained military prosecutors. The Vanessa Guillén Military Justice Improvement and Increasing Prevention Act is the House companion to Senator Gillibrand’s Military Justice Improvement and Increasing Prevention Act (MJIIPA), which has 66 co-sponsors.
In addition to tackling the serious issue of sexual assault in the military and holding service members accountable for their crimes, the legislation would address systemic barriers to justice for service members of color. Black and Hispanic service members are more likely than white members to be tried in general and special courts-martial in all military services, and Black service members are up to two and a half times as likely to face disciplinary action as their fellow white service members. While 43% of our service members are people of color, only two of the 46 most senior admirals and generals are Black. Moving prosecution decisions to professionals could help to reduce this bias.
See below for quotes from members of the CBC:
“The brave men and women of the United States Armed Forces deserve a system that protects survivors of sexual assault. I am proud to join my House and Senate colleagues in endorsing this critical piece of legislation that will help address the epidemic of military sexual assault while also dismantling the many barriers that prevent servicemembers from attaining justice.” - Senator Cory Booker
“Our military justice system is failing servicemembers of color and survivors of sexual assault. The young women and men who wear the uniform and protect our country deserve a system that provides fairness and equal justice. Our military connects our communities, that’s why this fight is critical to our broader efforts reforming and transforming our broader justice system for all Americans.” - Congressman Anthony G. Brown (MD-04)
“We must not forget Vanessa Guillén. Her story gained national attention from my colleagues and people across the country, who were outraged and protested in her honor. The time is now to pass legislation that will reform the military justice system and prosecute egregious crimes like the one that led to her death. As Chair of the CBC, I will ensure that we focus on the neglectful treatment of servicemembers of color and survivors of sexual assault. The Congressional Black Caucus, will stay focused on closing the longstanding racial inequities in our country and, as the conscience of the Congress we will keep fighting for justice.” - CBC Chairwoman Joyce Beatty
“The murder of Vanessa Guillén shocked the nation and exposed the long-standing failures of our military justice system to protect servicemembers of color and survivors of sexual assault,” said Congressman Horsford. “The Congressional Black Caucus is honored to use our power and our message to push for the passage of this bipartisan legislation, which will make important reforms to reduce bias in our military justice system, stamp out sexual harassment and assault, and ensure that survivors can receive the justice they deserve. We need to create a culture in our military and its justice system that protects all those who answer the call to serve and reflects our values. We owe it to our servicemembers to get this done.” - CBC First Vice-Chair Steven Horsford
“Vanessa Guillén’s tragic death has been a call to action for the country regarding what must be done to protect our young soldiers from harassment and sexual assault, especially because women soldiers and soldiers of color face disproportionate punishment, as well as service-wide disparities in the way their cases are handled. While nothing can bring Vanessa back, we must do all we can to provide justice and accountability. The Vanessa Guillén Military Justice Improvement and Increasing Prevention Act will do this by reforming the military justice system by removing the decision to prosecute serious crimes in the military from the chain of command. I am proud to co-sponsor this bill, and I will continue to use my role on the Armed Services Committee to continue to fight for equal rights under the law for all servicemembers.” - Congressman Marc Veasey
“The Vanessa Guillén Military Justice Improvement and Increasing Prevention Act is a crucial step to ensure that our government and our military are stepping up to protect the brave servicemembers, women, and people of color who step up to protect and defend us every day. We must honor SPC Guillén with action by reforming our military justice system to better uphold our values and making the changes that survivors of sexual assault have been calling for.” - Congresswoman Marilyn Strickland
The following sites updated: