Tuesday, July 18, 2023

Look who Elon pays

Twitter's a garbage heap.  Elon Musk ended up making it worse, if you can believe it.  He distracted it with the help of his hand maiden Matt Taibbi.  The transphobe typed while Musk dictated and called it reporting.  Then he wants to whine.  Good Lord, even Glenn Greenwald called him out for the arrangement.  (Check The Vanguard.  The last time he was on the program, he stated he would not have entered the deal that Matt did.)  Nikki McCann (Rolling Stone) reports:

Last week, prominent Twitter Blue accounts began posting screenshots of thousand-dollar payouts they received through the platform’s newly launched ad revenue-sharing program. 
[. . .]




Figures like Andrew Tate, a misogynistic media personality who is currently facing charges of human trafficking in Romania, took home more than $20,000. Other influential right-wing accounts like Ian Miles Cheong, Benny Johnson, and QAnon influencer Jacob Creech netted several thousand. But it’s not all sunshine and checks, a number of prominent conservative accounts are furious that they were excluded from the first round of payments — some even think the system will make the website worse. 

The account @Catturd2, an anonymous right-wing shitposter whose real-world identity is concealed by pseudonymous cat, boasts almost two million followers. Previously a Musk sycophant, Catturd has soured on the billionaire in recent months, and wrote on Monday that “most, not all, of the hand-picked Twitter accounts who were given big checks, not because of their ad revenue potential, but for being teacher’s pets are becoming insufferable.”  

Catturd complained that he had “tried to figure out how I could get paid at first because of the size of my engagements and the years of work I’ve put in, but now that I see what’s going on, I’m good.” 

“I don’t want my account to become a suck-up cringefest,” he added. 


Grasp the people rewarded.  Crackpot Q-anons and Andrew Tate with criminal charges.  That's what Twitter is all about now days.  One big garbage dump.


U.S. Representative Steven Horsford understands dog whistles and the coded talk that goes on in politics. And when the veteran Congressman hears a MAGA Republican use the now ubiquitous word “woke” — as in Gov. Ron DeSantis‘s “war on woke” — Horsford thinks that what those Republicans really mean is “Black.”

Communicating tacit messages to certain groups while appearing to address larger populations with more general language is a tactic political operatives have always used to flatter the base — while appearing to remain above the fray.

(For more, see Ian Haney López‘s book Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class.)

Horsford, a Democrat, represents Nevada’s 4th District, which is about 47 percent White and only 5.4 percent Black, in the House of Representatives. He laments the current political situation where, he implies, progress on racial equity is under siege by the MAGA adherents in the House.

 I agree.  The attacks on "woke" have morphed into attacks on race. 

Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

 

Tuesday, July 18, 2023.  The PUK goes after Cardinal Louis Sako, hate merchant Ron DeSantis laying off campaign staff, RFK Junior a continued embarrassment, Trump plots acts of revenge should he become president again, and much more.


Cardinal Louis Sako, patriarch of the Chaldean Catholic Church, announced Saturday that he is withdrawing from his seat in Baghdad after Iraqi President Abdul Rashid revoked a decree recognizing him as head of the Christian Church in Iraq.

Sako said he will be taking up residence in a monastery in Kurdistan, an autonomous region of Iraq, where he will continue to lead the Chaldean Church.  

In a statement issued July 15, Sako called the president’s action — which calls into question his ability to control Church assets in the country — “unprecedented” and “unfair.”

“It is unfortunate that we in Iraq live in the midst of a wide network of self-interest, narrow factionalism, and hypocrisy that has produced an unprecedented political, national, and moral chaos, which is rooted by now more and more,” Sako wrote. “Therefore, I have decided to withdraw from the patriarchal headquarters in Baghdad.”

What's going on?  A number of things, actually.  AFP noted a few days ago a political conflict:

Cardinal Louis Sako, patriarch of the Chaldean Catholic Church, announced Saturday that he is withdrawing from his seat in Baghdad after Iraqi President Abdul Rashid revoked a decree recognizing him as head of the Christian Church in Iraq.

Sako said he will be taking up residence in a monastery in Kurdistan, an autonomous region of Iraq, where he will continue to lead the Chaldean Church.  

In a statement issued July 15, Sako called the president’s action — which calls into question his ability to control Church assets in the country — “unprecedented” and “unfair.”

“It is unfortunate that we in Iraq live in the midst of a wide network of self-interest, narrow factionalism, and hypocrisy that has produced an unprecedented political, national, and moral chaos, which is rooted by now more and more,” Sako wrote. “Therefore, I have decided to withdraw from the patriarchal headquarters in Baghdad.”

 

Abdul Latif Rashid is the president of Iraq . . . somehow.  Mainly because rules aren't followed in Iraq.  He's PUK which came in second to the KDP -- came in second, yet again.  The PUK insisted that they would have the presidency -- which always goes to a Kurd, regardless -- and so Abdul became president.  He's got a long of history of running in and out of Iraq though not quite the coward former prime minister and forever thug Nouri al-Maliki is.  He was a minister in Nouri's cabinet (Minister of Water Resources for seven years -- look around Iraq today and you can see what an awful job he did) and, his really big credit, he's the brother-in-law of Iraq's late fat ass Jalal Talabani.

He's married to Hero Talabani's sister Shanaz.  Hero is of course infamous for posing her husband -- post-stroke -- for photos when he couldn't talk and couldn't move his body.  Iraqis compared it to WEEKEND AT BERNIE'S on social media in real time.

Let's drop back to May 30, 2013:

Last December,  Iraqi President Jalal Talabani suffered a stroke.   The incident took place late on December 17th (see the December 18th snapshot) and resulted in Jalal being admitted to Baghdad's Medical Center Hospital.    Thursday, December 20th, he was moved to Germany.  He remains in Germany currently.  At the start of the month, there were new rumors swirling about his health and, this past week,  Nouri al-Maliki attempted to have Jalal stripped of his post this month.  (Parliament rejected the notion.) Following that,  Al Mada ran a photo of Jalal Talabani seated outdoors with his medical team and noted the team states the Iraqi President's health has continued to improve and he will return to Iraq shortly. 

Arabic social media has been referring to the photos and the video as having a Weekend At Bernie's type feel to it.  (In Weekend At Bernie's, two young men prop up the corpse of dead Bernie to trick people into believing he's alive.)  The fact that Jalal's only seen in the video and the photos from his right side have people speculating about what the left side shows -- the after-effects of a stroke? Salah Nasrawi (Al-Ahram) notes:


Rumours have been abundant about Talabani’s health condition as his convalescence coincides with one of Iraq’s most serious political crises and its deadliest period of ethno-sectarian strife since the United States pullout in 2011.
Some reports have suggested that Talabani is clinically dead in the Berlin hospital where he is treated, others said the enfeebled president has handed his will to one of the leaders of his party.
Regardless of the furious speculations among Iraqis about Talabani’s health conditions, his prolonged absence has sparked a debate about whether he will be physically able to resume official duties.
According to various medical studies, persons who had strokes mostly develop serious physical and emotional problems occurring after recovery and they will need prolonged treatment.


Dropping back to the October 18, 2021 snapshot:


In 2012,  Iraqi President Jalal Talabani suffered a stroke.   The incident took place late on December 17, 2012 (see the December 18th snapshot) and resulted in Jalal being admitted to Baghdad's Medical Center Hospital.    Thursday, December 20, 2012, he was moved to Germany.  He remained there for a year and a half.  He was incapacitated.  But the Talabani family lied to everyone so that, as the Iraqi Constitution requires, Jalal wouldn't be removed from office.

They lied to the country.  They deceived the Iraqi people.  They propped him up and posed him for pictures -- leading Arabic media to mock it as WEEKEND AT BERNIE'S -- but they couldn't offer video because he couldn't speak.



The first time was in May. Jalal was posed for a series of photos that appear to indicate his body was present but that was all.

jalal



The second set, months later, also showed Jalal posed with his right side to the camera.

[. . .]

Over 18 months later Jalal would return.  They wouldn't be able to use the return to pump up his party in elections because he couldn't speak.

In other words, the Talabani family lied to the Iraqi people, deceived them.  Iraq had a non-functioning president who should have been removed from office.  But the Talabanis lied to keep Jalal in a post he could not serve.

[. . .]

They lied to the country.  They deceived the Iraqi people.  They propped him up and posed him for pictures -- leading Arabic media to mock it as WEEKEND AT BERNIE'S -- but they couldn't offer video because he couldn't speak.

He never spoke in public again.  Not even when he returned to Iraq 18 months after his stroke.


He was not able to do any duties and he was not able to speak but the Talabani family lied to the press and to the people so that they could hold onto the position and the prestige.  They harmed Iraq in the process.  Iraq needed a real president.  It had none.  


The next election showed how much damage the Talabanis had done to the PUK and that's been true ever since.  In addition, you've got Jalal's sons showing up to try to tell the Kurds what to do.  They love that -- and who wouldn't?  One of Jalal's pampered sons who lives in the US and is married to an American woman returning to the Kurdistan to lecture them on how they shouldn't want independence for Kurdistan, lecturing them on how they shouldn't vote for it in a non-binding referendum.  


Now comes Abdul to further disgrace the Talabani family and the PUK.  FARS MEDIA CORPORATION notes:

A source at Asianews points out that the whole affair turns on this point: “Someone wants to take control over the assets and properties held by Christians and the Church.” President Abdul Latif Rashid has intervened in recent days with the intention of “clarifying” his decision.

His office issues a statement saying: “Withdrawing  the republican decree does not prejudice the religious or legal status of Cardinal Louis Sako, as he is appointed by the Apostolic See.” According to the Kurdish Muslim leader, “the abolition of the Presidential Decree is intended to correct the situation,” while the patriarch continues to enjoy “the respect and appreciation of the presidency of the Republic as Patriarch of the Chaldean Church in Iraq and the world.”

“However, the president’s decision strips the Chaldean leader – the Patriarch – of the right to administer church assets, which are the target of Ryan 'the Chaldean' and his Babylonian Brigades. ‘It’s no coincidence that the president’s decision came a few days after he met with Ryan,’” a source told AsiaNews.

“For over 100 years, the patriarch, after his papal appointment, had his office recognized by decree by the king and then the president, upholding his status as head of the Church and custodian of its properties.” With the withdrawal of the decree, the primate “will likely lose control over the [Church’s] assets and properties,” the source concludes, but Cardinal Sako “is determined to fight and is already studying ways to appeal in court so that law prevails and justice is done.”

The controversy surrounding the withdrawal of the presidential decree is the latest chapter in a series of attacks that have affected the most respected figure of the Chaldean Church in Iraq, to the point that in recent weeks there has arisen a backlash among Christians in response to the “lies”: an attack against the patriarch and the leadership of the Church by the leader of the Babylonian Movement, Rayan.


Let's move over to bad American dinner theater or 'politics,' if you like.





NBC News reported this weekend that Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) had to fire some staff after realizing he hired too many people before securing the fundraising. The report detailed some critical missteps in the DeSantis money machine that predicts a difficult path forward.

Candidates have donors that give them the maximum amount per election, meaning both the primary and general elections. They can't spend the money in the general election. So, of DeSantis' $12 million cash on hand, he can only spend $9 million of it.

To add to his problems, "about $14 million of his second-quarter haul came from donors who gave the maximum legal amount," NBC News explained. "In other words, roughly two-thirds of his early donors will not be able to give directly to his campaign for the duration of the race."

It means DeSantis has already burned through the big donors closest to him, and he's got to figure out how to find more or ramp up a heavy fundraising effort for tons of low-dollar donors. The problem with the latter strategy is that Donald Trump spent the past eight years building an extensive GOP donor list. They hammer the donors through emails and text messages until they stop giving money or unsubscribe.

So, DeSantis would have to find donors that aren't Trump's. Those people are generally more moderate, the so-called "NeverTrumpers" or "RINOS" (Republicans In Name Only). But DeSantis has run to the right of Trump, so he's not going to appeal to those two groups.



Moderate Republicans?  They're not going to go with Doo-Doo Ron Ron.  They're usually of the opinion that the focus needs to be on the economy and on business.  Doo-Doo Ron Ron's war on DISNEY isn't a good look for them nor are his attacks on gay people and on abortion.  How does he plan to get money?  I don't see Donald Trump supporters moving to him.  Wouldn't it be funny if he had to drop out due to lack of campaign donations?  

At THE FLORIDA TIMES-UNION, Amy Glassman writes of how Ron is damaging the lives of so many:


The first time I visited the LGBTQ Center at the University of North Florida as a 20-something undergraduate student, I cried on the shoulder of a complete stranger. That stranger looked like me, loved like me and — as an LGBTQ+ person — understood my anguish. All my walls finally crumbled.

I was only a few short years into my young adult life. I was already struggling to balance working multiple part-time jobs, attending full-time classes, navigating a toxic romantic relationship, dealing with family rejection and facing a serious identity crisis.

Most of the people I had known my entire life wrote me off when I was outed as gay, but when this stranger at the LGBTQ Center told me I was not alone and it would all be OK, I believed them. That single interaction restored my strength to keep going.

[. . .]

But Florida’s governor, Ron DeSantis, thinks diversity, equity and inclusion programs are just window dressings.

In fact, Gov. DeSantis feels so strongly about centering the Florida education system around his own white Christian values and culture, he has cut funding for all diversity, equity and inclusion programs in Florida colleges and universities, a law that took effect July 1.

Under the new law, colleges and universities are not allowed to use federal or state funding for DEI initiatives on campus, which undercuts their ability to replace these resources through other funding opportunities.

One of many problems with his plan is that colleges and universities are not just schools, they are homes. Students live on campus, often without transportation; they rely on the school’s on-campus offerings to help them build community and feel comfortable in their new home.

I have never lived on campus and was not even a UNF student. I attended Florida State College at Jacksonville, but I had access to resources and clubs on both campuses through my participation in the UNF Army ROTC program. The programs I found there were literally lifesaving to me.

If I needed these things living off-campus in my hometown, the students who left their entire lives behind to attend college in a new city definitely need them.

Places like the Interfaith Center offer people from all faiths a community while they are away from their own. It offers them an opportunity to talk about their culture with others and find consensus on how we are all the same, no matter our differences. Diverse programs like these are powerful for bringing people together, which we could all use a little more of these days.

In my experience with the Interfaith Center, I have led discussions with students about the intersection of religion and sexual orientation, shared my journey to finding myself in Judaism and learned about other’s experiences too, which also helped me heal. This space gave me the opportunity to help those who were once like me — lost and trying to figure out if I could fit into my religion while still loving who I loved.

Religious spaces have not been historically welcoming places for me, but that has never been the case at the Interfaith Center. Instead of seeing only my own identity reflected in the people there, I saw a beautiful mosaic of people from all walks of life. It exposed me to different cultures and religions. Even better, I have always been welcomed and fully accepted, no caveat.


Connectivity to people like you and exposure to people different from you are both necessary to growing into a well-rounded member of society. When these two components of life are balanced, you become more empathetic toward others and you feel more empowered with a community around you. According to researchers, social support builds resilience and lowers stress, allowing individuals to tackle adversity while maintaining good physical and mental health.



Ron is fueled by hate.  Speaking of, Moms For Liberty.  Jen Psaki reported on them Sunday.





Anyone who has been paying attention to the frequent chaos and anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric at school board meetings nationwide and efforts to ban books by and about LGBTQ+ people and people of color, you’re already well aware of what Moms for Liberty stands for.
But as Psaki noted on the July 16 episode of Inside with Jen Psaki, the organization claims to be non-partisan. That, along with the group’s misleading and innocuous-sounding name, has left many people confused about Moms for Liberty’s agenda — even after they themselves get involved with the group.

“Moms: great, sounds good. Liberty: awesome, who doesn’t like liberty? ‘Moms for Liberty.’ As the mom of two young kids, that even sounds good to me,” Psaki said. “But it’s vague enough, that even some of its own members are pretty unclear as to what the group is really all about, what they’re a part of.”

“Well, I’m here to help,” she continued. “Because as benign as Moms for Liberty may sound, its agenda is unmistakably extreme.”

She went on to catalog the group’s tactics and causes, including leading the movement to ban books, turning school board meetings into screaming matches, and intimidating both local officials and others in their communities.

“Chapters and members across the country have led campaigns targeting community advocates, school board members, and opposing groups,” Psaki explained. “They’ve repeatedly sent intimidating messages, openly threatened officials, and even baselessly leveled charges of child abuse and sympathizing with pedophilia.”

She also noted that one Indiana chapter infamously included an Adolph Hitler quote in a newsletter. The group apologized but later defended the inclusion of the quote.

Psaki also demolished Moms for Liberty’s claim that it is a nonpartisan organization. “Consider this,” she said. “One of the founders, whose name is notably omitted from its website, is a current Republican school board member who is married to the now-chairman of the Florida Republican Party. In 2021, he told the Washington Post, ‘I have been trying for a dozen years to get 20- and 30-year-old females involved with the Republican Party. But now Moms for Liberty has done it for me.’”

She also noted early in the segment that the group recently hosted five Republican presidential candidates, including Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis, at its annual summit in Philadelphia.


Yes, they did host five.  It was supposed to be six that they were platforming but Democratic Party candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. decided to back out at the last minute for reasons we've covered in real time.  In last night's "RFK Jr. is disgusting," Trina covered reactions to Junio's vile and racist statements.  I will add that one of his defenses is that, he says, it was supposed to be off the record.  Goatha.  It's okay to be racist if you're off the record?  Thanks for clarifying that.


Kennedy’s ravings shed light as well on the bankrupt and reactionary character of the campaign for a “left-right alliance” launched by various figures aligned with the pseudo-left, including author Chris Hedges and journalist Glenn Greenwald. They might personally abhor Kennedy’s remarks about Jews and Chinese, but Greenwald conducted a sympathetic interview with Kennedy after he launched his presidential campaign, which gave considerable attention to his opposition to vaccine mandates and other COVID mitigation measures.




Yes, rounding out the crazy, there is always Donald.  Ken Meyer (MEDIAITE) reports:


Former White House Chief of Staff John Kelly warned that if Donald Trump is re-elected to the White House, the government will be thrown into chaos by his reported plan to expand his presidential powers.

The New York Times’ Jonathan Swan, Charlie Savage and Maggie Haberman reported that Trump and his allies seek to consolidate more power and authority into the Oval Office if they can get him re-elected in 2024. The plan would reportedly consist of Trump assuming direct control over independent government entities, easing the process through which he can fire bureaucrats he doesn’t like, and reviving the power to “impound” Congressional funding for programs he may not approve of.

“The two driving forces of this effort to reshape the executive branch are Mr. Trump’s own campaign policy shop and a well-funded network of conservative groups, many of which are populated by former senior Trump administration officials who would most likely play key roles in any second term,” the Times reported. “Some elements of the plans had been floated when Mr. Trump was in office but were impeded by internal concerns that they would be unworkable and could lead to setbacks.”

Kelly was among the Trump veterans with whom the Times spoke, and he said that Trump trying to seize power this way would instigate pandemonium across the three branches of government. This follows the sworn statement Kelly previously gave, claiming Trump wanted to weaponize the IRS against his political foes.



The following sites updated:

No comments: