Thursday, August 4, 2022

The world Clarence Thomas is destroying



After passing the House with the support of 47 Republicans, the Respect for Marriage Act, which would protect marriage rights for same-sex couples if the Supreme Court were to overturn its 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, faces much dimmer prospects in the Senate. There is one reason why: the Christian right still controls the Republican Party. Movement leaders know it took 50 years to reverse Roe, and are committed to a similar strategy to undermine and eventually overturn Obergefell. With abundant clues in the Supreme Court’s June decision overturning Roe that LGBTQ rights could be next on the chopping block, it is unimaginable that movement leaders would sink that goal by allowing this bill to become law.


Republican senators are keenly aware of this. That is why South Dakota’s John Thune and Louisiana’s Bill Cassidy accused Democrats of introducing the bill to distract from inflation. It is why Florida’s Marco Rubio called it “a stupid waste of time,” and claimed gay Floridians are “pissed off” about something else — high gas prices. And it is why Maine’s Susan Collins, who was one of the bill’s four original Republican supporters, came up with the laughing-crying emoji argument that, because Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) had struck a surprise deal on Democratic legislative priorities late last month, she would struggle to win fellow Republicans’ support for the marriage bill. “[I]t was a very unfortunate move that destroys the many bipartisan efforts that are under way,” she told HuffPost.

These were opportune but risible excuses.The reality is these Republicans were already seeing an avalanche of opposition from Christian right political advocacy organizations. Family Research Council Action, the political arm of the Family Research Council church, began calling the bill the “(Dis)Respect for Marriage Act” before it reached the House floor. The group reminded Republican lawmakers that their party platform states, “[t]raditional marriage and family, based on marriage between one man and one woman, is the foundation for a free society and has for millennia been entrusted with rearing children and instilling cultural values.”




Maybe it is time we contacted our senators office?  I will be saying that I am a God fearing American citizen and I support marriage equality and strongly oppose efforts to discriminate or turn back the clock.

People who want to turn back the clock?  I always think they need to be asked: Who's family?  Who's values?

Because it's not being inclusive for them.  It's about punishing and denying others -- that's the only way they feel special.

Wedding dates are getting moved up. Paternity documents and wills are being updated. Homes are up for sale.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to eliminate the right to an abortion quickly renewed debate over the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people — especially those living in red states. Worried the court will revisit other rulings like gay marriage, some LGBT Texans are changing their life plans, with some deciding to leave the state.

Preparing for the worst is helping some wrest a feeling of control — and, sometimes, even eke out a modicum of joy — in an otherwise chaotic and frightening time.

Gay marriage is safe for now. Legal experts say it could be years before the Supreme Court is asked to revisit one of its landmark decisions on LGBT rights. But Texas law contains few protections for LGBT residents. Texas is one of 25 states that define marriage as between one man and one woman in their state constitutions even though these bans are unconstitutional. And while unenforceable, Texas law also still outlaws gay sex.

In the wake of the abortion ruling, some of the state’s most powerful officials have promised once again to target LGBT issues. The rights of transgender Texans, in particular, are in their sights. 


This is having real world impact.  

Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


Thursday, August 4, 2022.  The PACT Act passes the US Senate and Moqtada is sprouting and sporting boobies.



Turkish warplanes again launched an aerial attack on an area in the semi-autonomous Kurdistan region of northern Iraq, a fortnight after artillery bombardment against a tourist resort in the same district caused multiple casualties. 

Kurdish-language media outlets reported that Turkish fighter jets targeted the Amadiya district in the northern Iraqi province of Dohuk on Wednesday.



It's not registering.  These days little does.  The Yazidis are trying to get some press attention and that's really not happening either.  And on Arabic social media, it's largely the same thing.  

The only exception there is the commenting on Moqtada al-Sadr's tv address yesterday -- and people commenting on how large his man boobs have become.  As he loses a little more power in Iraq, maybe he can become the Dolly Parton of Iraq?   Win a wet t-shirt contest or two?


🇮🇶 Influential #Shiite cleric Muqtada al-#Sadr told followers Wednesday to continue their sit-in inside #Iraq’s government zone. Sadr called for the dissolution of parliament and early elections, signaling a deepening power struggle with his rivals. explains ⤵️
316 views
0:19 / 1:29
 







There's a funny meme where Moqtada's speaking and we see footage of his male supporters with many touching the left side of their chests but a few touching the right side and a caption about how they're striking their chests trying to grow big breasts like Moqtada has.  




Moqtada has lost power and the press would be telling you that if they were capable of honesty and if they were able to use their own eyes and ears.  

Protests, CBS NEWS's Jim Axelrod notes in a discussion about current events, continue inside and outside the Parliament.  And he's right about that.  But why is the inside part not news?


Yesterday, his lieutenant Tweeted for the cult to leave the Parliament and protest outside.  And the men didn't.  So he took to TV and pretended he hadn't asked them to leave the Parliament.  

How do you miss that?  How do you write about what's going on and not note that Moqtada can't control his goons.

The point of leaving the Parliament was attempting to reach out to the Iraqi people.  The Iraqi people as a group are not thrilled with Moqtada's trash occupying their Parliament.  They see it as disrespectful and they're commenting on how trashy it looks.  That is their national buidling.  

But Moqtada's goons wouldn't leave.  

What kind of a cult leader can't control his own cult?

He couldn't pull off the formation of a government and that didn't spark any realization among the western press.  So maybe they are honestly missing reality -- or maybe they're just distracted by Moqtada's big boobs.  Laure Al-Khoury (APF) observes, "Nearly 10 months on from the last elections, the country still has no government, new prime minister or new president, due to repeated squabbles between factions over forming a coalition."  THE ARAB WEEKLY notes:

Nearly 10 months on from the last elections, the country still has no government, new prime minister or new president, due to repeated squabbles between factions over forming a coalition.

In the latest political turmoil to strike the oil-rich but war-scarred nation, Sadr called for a "revolutionary and peaceful process, then early democratic elections after the dissolution of parliament".

His televised speech came as his supporters occupied parliament for a fifth consecutive day, in protest at a nomination for prime minister by Coordination Framework, a rival pro-Iran Shia faction.

However, parliament can only be dissolved by a majority vote, according to the constitution. Such a vote can take place at the request of a third of lawmakers, or by the prime minister with the president's agreement.



If they were to hold new elections, would Moqtada abide by them?  He's the big loser here.  He's not reached out beyond his cult.  He has angered Shi'ites in Iraq with the occupation of Parliament.  They see it as disrespectful and they're not interested in what he's saying or why he's saying it.  The Sunnis don't like him and never will.  Kurdish leaders like him but the Kurdish people aren't fond of him.  His hope was to appeal to Shi'ites across the nation.  And that's failed thus far.  

So new elections?  Who's gong to vote for Moqtada?  He did well last October because most Iraqis boycotted voting.  Having seen all he's put the country through for the last months, they're more likely to turn out in new elections.

If that happens and Moqtada goes back to his usual low numbers, is he going to respect those results or just keep calling for new elections over and over unless he gets the results he wants?



Officials in Iraq called on Wednesday for a national dialogue to end the country's political deadlock, Anadolu news agency has reported. President Barham Salih met with Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kadhimi in Baghdad to discuss the recent political developments.

According to a statement issued by the Iraqi president's office, the two men discussed the importance of ensuring security and stability, with a commitment to calm and reliance on a careful and responsible dialogue that addresses the crisis. The intention is to set out a clear roadmap and solutions to protect the national interest as a priority.

Salih has also met with the head of the UN Mission for Iraq, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, and discussed the latest political developments. "The circumstances in the country require a commitment to calm and to engage in an honest and careful dialogue that deals with the political situation in order to reach a clear roadmap," he told the UN official. In response, Hennis-Plasschaert stressed that the mission supports dialogue between all parties and access to paths that preserve security and stability and achieve Iraqi aspirations.


Moqtada had months to form a government and couldn't.  Now Shi'ites feel he's disrespecting the Parliament and disrespecting the country.  What support is he winning?  Especially as he rejects calls for dialogue.



Al-Sadr also dismissed dialogue with his his political rivals in the Coordination Framework, an alliance of mostly Iran-backed parties. Al-Sadr said that talks in the past "didn't result in anything for us or for the country."

"There is no point of that dialogue, especially after people have spoken their free and spontaneous word," he said.

The Coordination Framework includes the Hashed al-Shaabi, a former paramilitary network now integrated into Iraq's security forces. Al-Sadr's longtime foe, former Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, is also part of the grouping. 

The rejection of talks follows a growing chorus of calls for dialogue from outgoing Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi, President Barham Saleh and Al-Sadr's foe al-Maliki, as well as international voices like French President Emmanuel Macron

The United Nations also urged Iraq's political leaders to prioritize national interest and end the power struggle. 



Moqtada refuses dialogue.  Iraq watches.  They see that his breast may be budding but he's  still immature.  


“After throwing away his plurality in the legislature in Baghdad, Muqtada al-Sadr has decided to seize the building instead” reports ➡️



TRT WORLD notes, "Sadr reiterated during his address on Wednesday that he was ready to 'be martyred' for his cause."  Martyred?  While in hiding?  Even his poses are laughable.

UNAMI issued the follwoing:

03 August 2022

Baghdad, 3 August 2022 - In recent months and weeks, the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) has consistently called for dialogue as the most effective way out of the protracted political crisis.

Meaningful dialogue among all Iraqi parties is now more urgent than ever, as recent events have demonstrated the rapid risk of escalation in this tense political climate. While parties assert the importance of democratic basics such as constitutional compliance and respect for state institutions, these are increasingly not observed. Their failure to move forward has had a clear adverse effect on public trust.

No party or group can claim that the crisis does not involve them or affect them. The need to find solutions through an all-inclusive dialogue is evident. In its absence, the state of Iraq will continue to be dominated by competing interests, leading to further instability, with the people paying the price. Such a scenario is simply intolerable. Within this context, UNAMI welcomes recent calls for national dialogue, and commends the expressions of support from across the political spectrum. We appeal to all actors to commit, actively engage and agree on solutions without delay.

Moreover, moving from words to deeds will now prove essential. Iraq cannot afford another national dialogue to go in vain. Iraqis do not need continued power struggles or stand-offs. They need solutions, and a commitment to implementing them, to draw their country out of its political crisis.

Iraq is facing an extensive list of outstanding domestic issues: it is in desperate need of economic reform, effective public service delivery as well as a federal budget - to name a few. Hence, it is past time for political stakeholders to assume their responsibilities and act in the national interest.

The United Nations stands, as always, ready to support and assist.



In the United States, the House passed the PACT Act which would assist veterans who were exposed to burn pits while serving in the US military.  While it passed the House, it did not pass in the Senate due to Republican objections.  After a weekend of veterans turning up the heat on Congress, Republican Seantors reconsidered their stance and the bill passed the Senate yesterday.

Senator Patty Murray's office issued the following:

Senator Murray Votes to Pass the PACT Act, a Historic Extension of Health Benefits to Veterans and Clears Path for Tri-Cities Veterans Clinic

Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, voted to pass the Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our PACT Act (PACT Act), sending it to the President’s desk. The PACT Act, which President Biden is expected to sign, will expand the toxic-exposure coverage for post-9/11 veterans and create a framework for coverage going forward. Last week, Senate Republicans blocked the PACT Act – a bill 25 of them previously voted to pass – as retaliation for Senate Democrats announcing the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.

Importantly, Senator Murray secured notable provisions to authorize and invest $36 million to lease a new VA clinic in the Tri-Cities area. This follows concerns raised by local veterans on the major challenges they have faced accessing the care and services they need. The provision would allow VA to replace and expand services currently offered through the Richland Outpatient Clinic to enhance outpatient services, close space gaps, and reduce strains on the Jonathan M. Wainwright Memorial VA Medical Center in Walla Walla. The facility would ensure veterans in the Tri-Cities region have greater access to primary, specialty, and mental health care. This new VA clinic would be critical to ensure patients can receive the health services they need from a VA provider closer to where they live, create jobs for more VA staff, and improve the level of care provided to veterans. 

“With this bill, generations of toxic-exposed Washington state veterans will finally be able to get the high-quality care they need and have earned, and VA will get the resources needed to process claims efficiently and better serve our vets.” said Senator Murray. “There’s a lot we need to do to really make sure the VA works for veterans, but passing the PACT Act will make a difference and save lives.”

“Importantly, I’m glad I was able to secure $36 million in federal funding in this legislation to help build a new VA clinic in the Tri-Cities,” added Senator Murray. “I believe strongly that no veteran should be driving hours to get the care they’ve earned. Building a new VA clinic in the Tri-Cities is going to help reduce the strain on the VA in Walla Walla and really make a difference in the quality of care for our veterans right here in Central Washington.”

“It’s downright shameful that Senate Republicans blocked this from passing last week,” Senator Murray said. “Democrats voted to make sure veterans get the health care they’ve earned. Republicans did not. They decided to play political games at the expense of sick veterans – that’s wrong but I’m glad this bill is finally headed to the President’s desk.”

Among its many priorities, the Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022 will:

  • Expand VA health care eligibility to more than 3.5 million toxic-exposed Post-9/11 combat veterans;
  • Create a framework for the establishment of future presumptions of service connection related to toxic exposure;
  • Add 23 burn pit and toxic exposure-related conditions to VA’s list of service presumptions, including hypertension;
  • Expand presumptions related to Agent Orange exposure;
    • Includes Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Guam, American Samoa, and Johnston Atoll as locations for Agent Orange exposure;
  • Strengthen federal research on toxic exposure;
  • Improve VA’s resources and training for toxic-exposed veterans; and
  • Set VA and veterans up for success by investing in:
    • VA claims processing;
    • VA’s workforce; and
    • VA health care facilities.

As a voice for Washington state’s veterans in the Senate, Senator Murray has been consistently fighting to make sure our country fulfills its promise to our veterans and their families. Senator Murray recently spoke on the Senate floor calling for swift passage of the PACT Act. In May, she introduced the Helping Heroes Act, new legislation to support the families of disabled veterans, including children who take on caregiving roles. Senator Murray is also a cosponsor of the BUILD for Veterans Act, which would help VA build new facilities that would better meet the needs of current and future veterans – including women veterans, veterans in need of long-term care and veterans with spinal cord injuries and diseases.

Senator Murray has led the fight to ensure VA expands fertility treatment and adoption services for veterans and their families through her Veteran Families Health Services Act. She is pushing VA to prioritize the long-term care needs of all veterans—including women veterans, veterans of color, LGBTQ+ veterans, and veterans with disabilities. Murray has also authored legislation that will give servicemembers the tools they need to build real financial security into retirement.

###


And the White House issued the following:

While we can never fully repay the enormous debt we owe to those who have worn the uniform, today, the United States Congress took important action to meet this sacred obligation. The bipartisan Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022­ is the biggest expansion of benefits for service-connected health issues in 30 years and the largest single bill ever to comprehensively address exposure to burn pits.

I called for this legislation in my State of the Union address, as part of my Unity Agenda to help bring together our nation. Congress has delivered a decisive and bipartisan win for America’s veterans. I want to thank Chair Tester and Ranking Member Moran as well as Chair Takano and Ranking Member Bost for their tireless work to pass this major reform, and the courageous veterans and advocates whose tenacity and heart ensured this legislation got done.

For the millions of veterans who may have been exposed to harmful toxins, this bill means quicker access to health care services and other benefits. This could be the difference between life and death for many suffering from toxic related illnesses. For the spouse or child of a servicemember who died from toxic exposure, struggling to put their lives back together, this bill will be a lifeline. It means a monthly stipend for a surviving spouse and kids, and access to tuition benefits to help cover the cost of college. It means access to life insurance, home loan assistance, and help with health care. It matters.

I have long said we have a lot of obligations as a nation, but we have only one sacred obligation – to prepare and equip those we send to war and to take care of them and their families when they come home.

I look forward to signing this bill, so that veterans and their families and caregivers impacted by toxic exposures finally get the benefits and comprehensive health care they earned and deserve.

###


The following sites updated:





  • No comments: