I've bit my tongue about the Ass Kiss Danny Schecther about as long as I intend to.
Danny the SEXIST PIG attacked Hillary non-stop during the primaries and played like he wasn't doing it. Now we know THE PIG LIAR was making a movie about Barack. Point: Danny had a lot on the line in a Barack win.
He's a hypocrite, he's a dumb ass and he's a PIG.
He never once called out the sexism against Hillary. He's not a "News Dissector" -- he's a Barack groupie going down on him daily such as this crap today: "Critics of his smily face to the right have to keep that in mind." Excuses, excuses from an alleged MEDIA WATCHDOG.
Danny Schechter is a stupid, fat ass who trashed his own reputation.
If he comments here, I will delete it because he does not allow comments at his site.
His itty-bitty sell out feelings got hurt when his readers kept calling him out for whoring for Barack.
That's all he is a whore, an apologist and a joke. That a grown man could be such a groupie is an embarrassment.
To Danny, I say, "Eat s**t, Fat Ass. You didn't even have the guts to tell your readers about Barack refusing to say, 'Yes, we will allow the coffins to be photographed.'"
Danny is a f**king hypocrite. And if you doubt that, grasp how he made a big deal of that in his film WMD. But now, with Barack, who cares?
That's why he's a whore. And a dumb one at that.
I've had it with his crap. I've had it with his disgrace.
He doesn't need to e-mail me either because I don't give a damn what he says.
When he gets called out for being a sexist, he likes to e-mail the woman and play boo-hoo, hurt feelings. He did that with a blogger and then STILL didn't write about sexism.
Danny, you're a sexist, a joke and a liar.
You've disgraced yourself. Retire or die, but go away. Quickly.
Repeating, DO NOT comment at my site, Schechter. I'll delete it. You don't allow comments at your site anymore because you couldn't take being called out for whoring. DO NOT e-mail me. Don't care what you have to say you insulting racially insensitive, lying, sexist PIG.
The ACLU has the guts Old Man Danny doesn't:
Justice Department Stands Behind Bush Secrecy In Extraordinary Rendition Case (2/9/2009)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; firstname.lastname@example.org
NEW YORK – The Justice Department today repeated Bush administration claims of "state secrets" in a lawsuit against Boeing subsidiary Jeppesen DataPlan for its role in the extraordinary rendition program. Mohamed et al. v. Jeppesen was brought on behalf of five men who were kidnapped and secretly transferred to U.S.-run prisons or foreign intelligence agencies overseas where they were interrogated under torture. The Bush administration intervened in the case, inappropriately asserting the "state secrets" privilege and claiming the case would undermine national security. Oral arguments were presented today in the American Civil Liberties Union's appeal of the dismissal, and the Obama administration opted not to change the government position in the case, instead reasserting that the entire subject matter of the case is a state secret.
The following can be attributed to Anthony D. Romero, Executive Director of the ACLU:
"Eric Holder's Justice Department stood up in court today and said that it would continue the Bush policy of invoking state secrets to hide the reprehensible history of torture, rendition and the most grievous human rights violations committed by the American government. This is not change. This is definitely more of the same. Candidate Obama ran on a platform that would reform the abuse of state secrets, but President Obama's Justice Department has disappointingly reneged on that important civil liberties issue. If this is a harbinger of things to come, it will be a long and arduous road to give us back an America we can be proud of again."
The following can be attributed to Ben Wizner, a staff attorney with the ACLU, who argued the case for the plaintiffs:
"We are shocked and deeply disappointed that the Justice Department has chosen to continue the Bush administration's practice of dodging judicial scrutiny of extraordinary rendition and torture. This was an opportunity for the new administration to act on its condemnation of torture and rendition, but instead it has chosen to stay the course. Now we must hope that the court will assert its independence by rejecting the government's false claims of state secrets and allowing the victims of torture and rendition their day in court."